“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Ideally that force is to a large extent self-protecting. It is also perceived to whatever degree possible (underlined) by all those at Prentice who are involved. At Framework-2 levels those people want to produce an excellent book. Their desire is not as vigorous as yours. It is watered down by far more Framework 1 activity. There is much “static” at that level.

Now: When you concentrate mainly (underlined) in Framework 1 and its communications with Prentice, then while overall you do achieve results of a beneficial nature—the publication and distribution of the books in a largely adequate form—there are glaring discrepancies also: entanglements that you do not like because you have taken your intent from Framework 2, where the creative event began, and placed it into Framework 1’s communication system almost entirely. Obviously you need Framework 1, with its letters, telephone calls, and so forth—but Framework 1’s communication system, while physically handy, also is somewhat like a very poor telephone connection, with static at both ends.

You reach each person you want separately. You must make your message clear regardless of the other person’s needs or circumstances, intents of the moment, and so forth. The more harassed you become, the more the static increases at both ends.

[...] On those occasions when Ruburt has heard me more or less directly in his psychological time experiments, there has always been on his part a sound quite independent of himself, from outside of himself, of static. If you recall, on several occasions he was so certain of the static that he checked to see if he had left the radio on by mistake.

The voice seemed to finally be formed, or to rise above this static, and on one occasion the voice was extremely loud.

[...] Jane says she has had this experience of static from which a voice emerged three times, all during psy-time.

But, you see, even this overall pyramid gestalt is not static. All or most concepts of a god deal with a static god and herein lies the main theological difficulties. [...] Again, there is no static god. [...]

But you must not think in terms of one line of development for creativity goes out in all directions, and All That Is having within itself the nature of all creativity cannot be static, cannot end and will always continue to create new development. [...]

([Ron:] “You say All That Is is not static. [...]

[...] When you turn on a radio to a particular station and find that it is distorted by static, you realize that the distortion is in the reception. [...]

[...] One of the most important points, I think, is that God is not static Himself. [...] But as Seth says, “Even this overall pyramid gestalt is not static. Most of your God concepts deal with a static God, and here is one of your main theological difficulties. [...] There is no static God. [...]

Numbers of you are looking for a state of “peace” in which there is a static sort of bliss, with all questions forever answered and all problems solved. [...]

[...] We do not have a static god, recreating himself as he is in various guises. [...]

There is a turning inward upon itself, but the inwardness is not a static condition. [...]

[...] Often your daily program is not nearly as clear or well-focused as it should be, but full of static; and while this may annoy you, you often put up with it or even become so used to the lack of harmony that you forget what a clear reception is like. [...]

[...] Indeed, often they can only add to your mental clutter, turning into “static” — so you must learn first of all what a clear focus is.

The first journey from one home station to another, unfamiliar one may bring you in contact with various kinds of bleed-throughs, distortions, or static. [...]

[...] The pendulum had swung too far over in both of your cases, to a discipline that became static and frozen. [...]

I am not saying that the personality will then become static, obviously, but the basic psychological framework will be such to allow the fullest development.

[...] I seemed to pick it up with my ears like a very loud garbled static; and this voice, a man’s, was distinguishable amid the static, and formed it somehow. The static was like a bubbling in my ears, from within. [...]

(As I began to put myself in a light trance state, suddenly from the living room came a static noise such as our radio often makes. [...]

[...] Negative suggestions could be compared to static sounding on an otherwise clear program.

Personalities are not static things. [...]

When psychic gestalts are made and formed they are not static. [...]

[...] This would not be a static elongation, however, but a vivid delving into that moment, from which all time as you think of it, past and future and all its probabilities, might emerge.

[...] You are not a static being. [...] And All That Is, or in your terms, God, is not a static being but always creative and always changing, so do not put yourself at a particular level of experience and stay there but allow yourself growth and freedom. [...]

[...] In one sense, identity is always a becoming, and it can never be a static, finished thing. [...]

[...] It is unfortunate that identity is considered generally as a rather static and permanent acknowledgment, for it is not.

This should be clearly understood, yet the personality is far from static. [...]

No psychic action is static. [...]

Now again, no psychic action is static. [...]

Never think of it as static. [...]

What you must understand is that the psychedelic experience represents but a glimmering of the constant state of the inner self: not constant in terms of something static, however. [...]