“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] This is not a general statement, but applies to the specific house of which we speak. [...]

(Also, I took exception to some statements made in the session this evening particularly that we concentrated too much upon the physical problems—granted that we created the problems, I could not understand how we were not supposed to pay any attention to the difficulties Jane had walking, etc, There was much more, and it’s not necessary to detail it all here.

[...] This is only a preliminary statement for other sessions, and I will not go into it deeply at this time.

5. I’d say that Seth’s statement here, “It was her second choice,” calls for careful interpretation. [...]

(John asked Seth a question about this statement. [...]

[...] In other statements in the past, Seth told us that any far-ranging space travel within our own system would also involve mental rather than physical journeys.

(Louise wondered why no one gave Jane a more explicit statement of what Seth had been saying and Rachel said he interrupted.)

[...] Ruburt read tonight my statement that without barriers there would be no time.

[...] I wanted him to enlarge upon the statement he’d made at 11:29 in the 690th session: “Further developments in your concepts will lead to greater activation in portions of the brain now not nearly utilized, and these in turn will trigger expansions in both psychic and biological terms.” [...]

While writing out this statement, I’m reminded that I experienced a milder version of the same sensation last month, while I was working at my part-time job in the art department of a local greeting card company. [...]

[...] If this sounds like a foolish statement it is not, for in many such cases the ulcer is so concentrated upon, and so much energy is used in its maintenance, and it is used as such a scapegoat, that the personality is loath to be rid of it.

When it is said that certain characteristics from a past life influence or cause present patterns of behavior, such statements, and I have made some of them, are grossly simplified simply to make certain points clear.

[...] This would give perhaps three quarters on the object definite enough, and possibly this gave rise to Seth’s statement about rough division into four areas. [...]

[...] What was projected finally however was your complete statement that you no longer agreed with the methods, that you would no longer go along with them, and this was to the good.

[...] Then see the equally interesting information on dreams in Session 699; I especially like Seth’s statement that “In a way, one remembered dream can be compared to a psychological photograph….” [...]

(John agreed with Seth’s statement, concerning his immediate superior not being, basically, his friend. [...]

(A very revealing statement, I believe.)

[...] Otherwise those statements made in the outline apply. [...]

[...] On the one hand the statement is indeed true. [...]

3. I should also note that Seth has made one short, rather mysterious reference to the existence of Frameworks 3 and 4. Two days after he’d first talked about his concept of Frameworks 1 and 2, he came through with the following statement in another private session. [...]