“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

The expressed (underlined) emotional anger, accusation or hurt on Ruburt’s part would automatically, or should, bring out in you an answering emotional statement. Answering in that any hurts or reasons on your part would be expressed with feeling, and the way cleared for an emotional statement of love, regret, or on both of your parts an emotional expression of sorrow for having hurt the other.

[...] This is the kind of thing I have been speaking of—the avoidance of a direct confrontation with those (in quotes) “negative emotions” blocks out the one emotional (in quotes) “solution”: an emotional statement on your part that counters it—a meeting of emotions.

Now: These units of consciousness (CU’s) move faster than the speed of light, then — but that statement itself is meaningless in a way, since the units exist outside as well as inside the framework in which light itself has meaning.

[...] Neither statement would be precisely correct in any case, because your present is a poised balance affected as much by the probable future as the probable past.

And in connection with Seth’s statement tonight that “… your bodies blink off and on like lights,” see Jane’s comments on her own feelings about related ideas in the notes at the beginning of the last session.

[...] To me there is no contradiction between that statement and the statement that the reality of that Rome is even now being affected by present, current concepts and beliefs. [...] Atlantis is as real as tomorrow is—and that is a loaded statement.

[...] A poetic statement carries weight for his personality, and this poetic statement has almost magical connotations. [...]

[...] If you recall such earlier statements I made concerning the nature of his energy pattern, he is geared to handle high amounts of energy, and to use them.

[...] These few statements, however, will help him, and help him enlarge on an inner circle of acquaintanceship with friendly colleagues that belong in those other categories, but are indeed friendly colleagues as well. [...]

Any physical ailment is symbolic of an inner reality or statement. Your entire life is a statement in physical terms, written upon time as you understand it.

The whole nature and structure of physical life as you know it, is a symbolic statement made by groups of entities who choose to work with physical symbolism. [...]

(9:50.) Your intimate physical environment is, therefore, a symbolic statement of an inner situation. [...]

(As usual, some of the test material obviously applied, and other statements seemingly did not. [...] So we were now curious to learn what application, if any, such statements as four, a masterpiece, a voice, etc., had to the test object. [...]

The other statements are obvious. [...]

(I did not realize at the time that Seth did not explain the masterpiece statement; I could have asked otherwise. [...]

(To Ron L.) And our friend, Edgar, judges the self that he knows far too harshly and do not ask me what I mean by the statement. [...]

[...] Science’s reasons are given as the only true statements of reality, with which no student is expected to quarrel. [...]

[...] A recognition of that simple statement would indeed change your world. [...]

(I read this statement at 11:40 AM, Sunday, July 20th, though Rob told me about his experience earlier this morning. [...]

[...] You feared upsetting Ruburt, and Ruburt would immediately insert desperately positive statements out of a panic to find that you were so disturbed, and this would anger you.

[...] He has always thought that you were used, mainly by your mother, but he was afraid that his statements would be misinterpreted because of his own relationship with his parents.

(10:12.) As with Andrea (see the last session), you must accept the validity of your feelings while realizing that they are about certain issues or conditions, and are not necessarily factual statements of your reality. [...] These are emotional statements and should be accepted as such. You are to understand, however, that while the feelings have their own integrity as emotions, they may not be statements of fact. [...]

[...] All of his statements concerning Jane’s writing sales have proved out so far. [...]

It is not a simple question that may be summed up in a statement, such as “attitudes regulate behavior.” [...]

(One of the questions Lorraine had at break, in relation to Seth’s statement about helping her, was whether Seth would help through Jane, or through Lorraine herself directly.

(Seth’s statement above, about trying something else, surprised me somewhat. [...]

I merely want to reassure Ruburt of my presence, to let him know that I hereby assert again those statements I made concerning his sitting on the porch.

[...] If you both read your statements in the morning, and you and Ruburt read his together, that will help you program the day. You can each remind the other when you feel low, at least to read those statements, for the work is easily done there, in Framework 2.

[...] The main methods, again, for him—one: read the statements in the morning, and when needed otherwise. [...]

It does not matter one way or the other—which may seem like an odd statement, but later you will see what I mean. [...]

[...] I’d told Andrew Fife that Pete would be calling him, probably requesting records, and that Fred Kardon may be called or asked for a statement, and so forth. [...]

[...] Dr. Eugene Barnard, a psychologist then at North Carolina State University, came out publicly with a statement favoring astral projection. [...]

“Look at the last statement then, carefully.”

[...] Later they signed a statement which is in our files. [...]

[...] According to his statements, however, he has “looked in on” friends occasionally.

[...] The patient’s emotional condition is such that he or she readily accepts statements made under such circumstances less critically than usual.

These are quite practical statements. [...]

[...] I thought I remembered a statement he’d made long ago, but now I couldn’t locate it within the body of his material. [...]

I am making statements about the nature of my perceptivity and your own. And you can accept the statements or not accept them, and that is entirely up to you. [...]

[...] In other words, if you had made kind of a nebulous statement about the nature of your perceptivity, if you had said something...”)