“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(My questions and statements were admittedly brief, and may have been too brief. [...]

[...] You may interpret the following statement as you wish: however, this engagement is important to both of us. [...]

[...] This is perhaps one of the most important statements of this evening’s session. [...]

[...] The following is taken from the tape verbatim, and includes a statement from Bill Gallagher, who witnessed the session with his wife Peggy. [...]

I have described those early sessions elsewhere, but here I’m including, instead, a poem that is a dramatic, intuitive statement about my feelings at the time. [...] Almost from the beginning, however, I did anticipate what the board was going to “say,” and the poem is as valid as any strictly factual statement I could make about those sessions — if not more so.

[...] The hearing, you see; the state of the hearing, is among other things a symbolic, physical statement of the lack of communication that has existed between you and your husband. [...]

[...] ‘Cause he might want a statement of when I would get an operation, and I don’t—I haven’t made up my mind if I want one or not, yet.”)

(Seth made this surprising statement at 10:12, just 21 minutes since we ended last break at 9:51. [...] I was so surprised by the statement that I did not think to make absolutely sure of the reading.

(The mail from Prentice-Hall is increasing considerably, whether or not this is in line with Seth’s recent statement that an increase in sales of the books is under way. [...]

[...] This statement applies also to your earlier questions this evening about the sperm. [...]

[...] That statement is only partially true. [...]

(“Earlier this evening I had mentioned to Jane my long-standing interest in Seth’s statement, years ago, that all ESP perceptions had an electromagnetic basis. [...]

I am quite aware that I am repeating myself again and again when I make that statement, but you need to be reminded that you are not at the mercy of unconscious events. [...]

[...] I also think the statement represents one way in which Jane, while speaking for Seth, interprets his reality for us in terms we can understand.

(Pause, then forcefully:) I am trying to temper my statements here, but your psychology of the past 50 years has helped create insanities by trying to reduce the great individual thrust of life that lies within each person, to a generalized mass of chaotic impulses and chemicals — a mixture, again, of Freudian and Darwinian thought, misapplied.

(There was a comment about Seth’s statement, as to how he had been around in a few of Rochelle’s endeavors. [...]

[...] Tam’s statement was quite unexpected by us. [...]

Ruburt was correct then in those statements he made last evening, having to do with the balance of routine and spontaneity, for his nature does need both. [...]

The implications of such statements for education are astonishing: Besides teaching rote information, our schools and universities should acquaint us with as many fields as possible; for these act as exterior triggers, bringing forth natural inner knowledge, sparking skills which are waiting for activation by suitable stimuli in the exterior world.

The facts are simply that you yourselves form these camouflage patterns, and I repeat this simple statement: You form the camouflage world of appearances with the same part of you that breathes. [...]

(While writing out this statement, I am reminded that I experienced the same sensation, one time in a milder form, about a year ago. [...]

[...] The child took literally the mother’s statements that though a cripple, she could walk at night, would turn on the gas jets, and so forth.

[...] Your thoughts have reality, but behind that statement is the apparently unrecognizable truth that your physical world is the exteriorization of your thoughts. [...]

[...] My second thought was to cut his statement out of this record entirely, so that Jane and I wouldn’t have to contend with it at all. [...]