“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Nevertheless there must also be balance, for to close yourself off too much robs you of any abundant expansion of spirit.

[...] You will speak their language even if you have a different spirit. [...]

([Arnold:] “What different spirit do I have?”)

You have a wiser, more creative spirit, but you will be able to translate what you get into technical terms which few can do comparatively speaking. [...]

[...] You see within yourselves the spirit of eternal vitality, and you honor it and you treat yourselves in that manner as gods. [...]

[...] It’s also one that may startle those who are used to quiet and proper “spirit guides.”

[...] You end up with Christs, spacemen, various saints or spirits, or other personality fabrications whose characteristics and abilities are already known.

In your terms of time, man has always projected unassimilated psychological elements of his own personality outward, but in much earlier times he did this using a multitudinous variety of images, personifications, gods, goddesses, demons and devils, good spirits and bad. [...]

[...] Remind yourselves also that despite all of your worrying, the spirit of life itself is continually within your experience, and forms your physical body.

[...] We can’t conceive of anything more worthwhile than to achieve an independence of spirit that’s based upon an independence of means, whether on a personal or national scale. [...]

[...] We want our world — our living world, the very planet itself — and every life form upon it, to exist in the greatest cooperative spirit possible, so that individually and collectively we can investigate what surely must be a myriad of still-unsuspected interior and exterior challenges.

I see that we are all in high spirits.

[...] You may assign them to “spirits” or disembodied personalities, but in such a way that these are thrown together in a confusing mass of dogma or superstition.

If you understood to begin with that you are a spirit, and therefore free of space and time yourself, then you could at least consider the possibility that some such messages were coming to you from other portions of your own reality. [...]

[...] There is nothing unconventional about gods and demons, good spirits or bad spirits. [...]

[...] Instead of thinking you are in contact with a great philosopher or “ancient soul,” you may believe that you are instead visiting with a demon or a devil, or that you are possessed of an evil spirit.

To think that all these years his good disposition has been dependent upon the cigarette between his lips, and not upon any native good spirits. [...]

[...] You avoided the kind of direct confrontation that would have resulted had you said, for example “I do not believe your spirit,” or “I do not believe he could do thus and so.” [...]

Spirit (must no) might have difficulty in necessary flexibility.

[...] (He then implied that spirits that had left the earth were seldom responsible in the first place.) Worry itself will, however, induce (he may have said “duplicate” ) a state similar to the preliminary stages of possession. [...]

[...] He could be scattered into several ‘spirit guides’; that’s how his reality would be interpreted, or come through …

[...] Again, I activate those coordinates that quicken high spirits, strength, and vitality — and I bid you a fond good afternoon.

[...] (Pause.) Whenever you refuse to accept the reality of your creaturehood, you also reject aspects of your spirit. [...]

[...] The combined events of spirit, mind and body involve not only the passing of one season but preparation for the beginning of another. [...]

I am no beady-eyed spirit. I am no granddaddy longlegs of the spirit world. [...]

On the other hand, it is an excellent practice to comment upon another individual’s obvious zest or energy or good spirits. [...]

(Pause.) Tell Ruburt that his spirits can indeed rise easily. [...]