“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

It builds up from feelings that are by their nature denied clear expression through the specific but therefore limiting alphabet systems. (Pause at 11:06.) It allows the perceiver to face experience much more closely, and once having done this to some extent he is free in other areas also. [...] You would be able to perceive and feel the experience with greater dimension, for your expression would not be limited to translating it automatically, without choice, into any one specific area. [...]

Now the Sumari language will avoid specific, indelible, rigid pattern in much the same way. [...]

[...] And do not ask for so many specifications. [...]

[...] This is to you (Sue) in one specific instance, for there is one area in which you do not realize you are projecting. [...]

([Hope W:] “Seth, can you suggest what specific daily steps I can take to develop my inner senses?”)

[...] From this more plastic, looser experience, the child in dreams begins to choose more specific elements, and in so doing trains the senses themselves toward a more narrow sensitivity.

[...] All of this teaches a specification. [...]

[...] I am speaking specifically of the brain, as separated from the mind, to emphasize the point that these abilities are of creaturehood. [...]

[...] One at least will be specifically written by me for that purpose.

There will be several books that simply result from our sessions, beside those that will be specifically dictated. [...]

Now, I will be glad to set up for you a definite program, geared to you specifically, toward the release and use of your psychic abilities whenever you are ready to take some session time to do so.

To some extent tonight’s relatively brief session should remove senses of urgency on your parts, or of self-criticism, that make you question when or how can you “learn to make” the magical approach work in any specific way—that is, why can you not learn to make the approach work in, say, helping Ruburt’s condition in a faster, more effective fashion? [...]

[...] It is better then, say, to use the approach because you recognize it for what it is, than to use it specifically in order to get something that you want, however beneficial. [...]

[...] However the color and the initial— the initials particularly, were quite specific. [...]

[...] Particular data about specific areas of reality are given to a living organism to make manipulation within that area possible. [...]

This sense, however, is concerned with the innate knowledge of the universe in its entirety; and particular data about specific areas of the universe often is given to a living organism to make manipulation in a specific area possible.

[...] The specifics showed their results, and as more specifics arise, if they do, I will mention them.

[...] The pity of the world’s present situation is that the methods people use often to achieve their desires, are those specific methods that will bring them the opposite.

(“Your impulses work in a specific manner, dealing with each individual or event, and based upon information that exists in Framework 2—which may not be consciously available.”

[...] Some are urgings not to act in specific cases.”

One important issue is to forget “the world,” and instead deal with specific instances. [...]

[...] “Well, I hope I don’t ever have to find a specific remark in these sessions any more, “because it’s becoming impossible.” [...]

(Meaning, of course, that the sessions have grown so extensive that they’ve become a closed system in themselves; without an index it’s now very difficult to track down specific material. [...]

I gave you a session not too long ago dealing with the natural person, and specifically with Ruburt’s natural characteristics. [...]

I did believe that I had answered that question this evening, specifically concerning the radio interviews, but also pertaining to the entire matter of Prentice publicity for the books just published. [...]

[...] Specifically you should not now join a community of the sort that is being planned.

(Seth didn’t comment specifically on the experimental results and Jane and I made our own connections.

[...] The cross effect can be easily found in the way I habitually wrap packages with strings and in the way I specifically wrapped the package to be mailed to the Bernards, thus:

Very briefly, I would suggest a specific dedication on Ruburt’s part, before our sessions, to our sessions. [...]

[...] But he is still looking for more specific data, and I believe we can give it to him.

We are not speaking of my part now; for in such cases the connections are becoming specific, you see, and the preliminary connection has been made. [...]

[...] We hadn’t asked Seth specifically to continue with these dreams, but still hoped he would, soon.)

[...] Seth began to be more specific on family reincarnational data when he told Jane and me in a very early session that neither of us would be born again on the physical plane; this, he said, accounted for our lack of children and the desire for them. [...]

[...] If the analyst, over a period of time, should convince Augustus that his condition in the present resulted from some specific inhibited event in the past, and if the analyst was an intuitive and understanding man, then Augustus might change his beliefs enough so that some kind of “cure” was worked. [...]

The solutions lie in the conscious mind — I cannot emphasize this too strongly — and in those beliefs that you accept about the nature of reality and, specifically, about the nature of your being.

[...] All specifications of consciousness and all phenomenal appearances occur when the basic units of consciousness, the CU’s, emerge into EE units, and hence into the dimensions of actuality in your terms. [...]

[...] Jane said that although Seth hadn’t actually considered my specific questions about psychology after all, they had served as an impetus for the Preface. [...]

[...] We could only hope that on some of the specific details given by Seth, the Gallaghers had noticed also. I asked Jane if she thought it possible for her to be more specific about place names, initials, etc. [...]

(We arrived at the idea of similes for some of the specific material, in case the idea of being exact scared Jane off, and she said she thought the “green cabaret” data might be a case in point.

Specific suggestions for Ruburt.

I will have more to say at a later time, for definite steps will be taken to see to it that he relates more specifically soon with the exterior world. [...]

[...] (Pause.) Science is used to asking quite specific questions, and as Ruburt wrote recently (in God of Jane) it usually comes up with very specific answers—even if those answers are wrong (with some humor).

[...] There are all kinds of definite, even specific, subjective evidence for the nature of your own reality—evidence that is readily apparent once you really begin to look for it, particularly by comparing the world of your dreams with your daily life.

[...] I thought they’d been [perhaps unwittingly] oriented in certain negative directions—that is, the one taking the test has to choose from a series of more or less negative possibilities, listing specific choices in an order that depends upon his or her personal belief systems—I think.

[...] I refer to those in which the specific symptoms of various diseases are given, in which the individual is further told to examine the body with those symptoms in mind. [...] Here the generalized fears fostered by religious, scientific, and cultural beliefs are often given as blueprints of diseases in which a person can find a specific focus — the individual can say: “Of course, I feel listless, or panicky, or unsafe since I have such-and-such a disease.”

[...] It builds up strong stresses, therefore, so that on many occasions a specific disease or threat situation is “manufactured” to rid the body of a tension grown too strong to bear.

[...] They all undermine the individual’s sense of bodily security and increase stress, while offering the body a specific, detailed disease plan. [...]