“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] This is travel along what we may call for simplicity’s sake a horizontal level.

[...] For simplicity’s sake, we will call the body forms discussed in our last session forms one, two and three.

Because of the basic simplicity of the elements in your universe, and for other reasons already mentioned, there is no real boundary neither chemical, electrical or even psychic, between the self and what is usually considered not self.

[...] We are using an analogy, and an analogy that is for simplicity’s sake only. [...]

You must again realize that we speak of the self as being so divided only for simplicity’s sake. [...]

[...] If for simplicity’s sake you think of other realities as different cities, then after you leave your own you would pass through the suburbs, then into the country, then after a time into other suburbs until you reached another metropolis. [...]

I will tell you the book, in what Ruburt thinks of as its somewhat inane simplicity, is very profound. [...]

[...] I have used the idea of neighboring systems for simplicity’s sake, as if they were laid out end to end. [...]

[...] Within its deceptive simplicity her poem carries profound meaning; I haven’t seen that meaning expressed any better elsewhere. [...]

This is all for the sake of simplicity—