“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] However, I certainly don’t mean that supposed reincarnational relationships can or should be used to justify present-life behavior. [...]

You should also know that nothing in our classes goes unrecognized or unrecorded in other layers of actuality beside those of which you know. [...]

[...] Then why should it amaze you that you are beginning to use and recognize some of the information that belongs to your entire identity? [...]

The full practical implication here should be understood: No course is irrevocably set or beyond change. [...]

It should certainly be obvious that dreams are not passive events. [...]

[...] Perhaps I should have questioned Seth about such possibilities, but their implications escaped me while he was speaking and I was busy taking notes. [...]

“It should be fairly easy to see how the second dilemma evolved from the first. [...]

“I am speaking in your terms now, and this should be understood, as I am simplifying conditions considerably. [...]

I have used Andrea because so many typical Western beliefs coincide in her reality — the idea that aging is disastrous; that women are relatively powerless without a man beside them; that life is, practically speaking, highly difficult while it should be ideally simple. [...]

[...] They may say that since an individual chose his or her problems in this life — deciding for instance to be born black, or poor, or both — that karma is being worked out; therefore such issues should not be adjusted through a change of law or custom. [...]

[...] Or should I say it stressed human qualities rather than those unfortunately considered male qualities. [...]

(When I called Pete back I told him about the Steve affair, and he said I should think twice before I cut out something that might give us extra income in the future. [...]

[...] I managed another grin — and who should know more about “magic” than Seth? [...]

[...] After Jane came through with her dictation I told myself I’d know what to do with it, and awoke the next morning with the clear understanding that her session should be presented just as is, and when we received it. [...]

(I should have asked Seth what he meant by nearly.)

[...] The word, onomatopoeia (there is a chance the first letter should be A instead of O) comes closest to explaining the inner nature of such sounds.

[...] She had the idea she should rub between her eyes in a circular motion— “You know, where the third eye would be,” she said. [...]

[...] You have agreed that restraints should be used. [...]

(“I should mention a couple more things, though. [...]

(“Do you mean we can or should try to contact every spirit?”)

When I told you to imagine the wire structure penetrating everything that is, I meant that you should always imagine these wires being live, as I am indeed a live wire myself.