“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] There is some sexual basis in the hidden man-woman symbolism in this respect, this being on a psychic level.

What he refers to as the shallowness, comparatively speaking, of his sexual response, had its beginning, again, when he knew the book would be published. [...]

Both of you, highly creative, find your creativity in conflict with your ideas of sexuality, privately and in your stance with the world. [...]

[...] Do not press overly, for sexual response. [...]

[...] Both of you, highly creative, find your creativity in conflict with your ideas of sexuality, privately and in your stances with the world. [...]

[...] You could have become all but sexually your mother’s husband. [...]

[...] Others have a series of female lives and then a series of male lives, or vice versa, but the entire reincarnational framework must involve both sexual experiences.

1. In Volume 2 of “Unknown” Reality Seth began developing his theory of counterparts — that the larger psychological self, or entity, of each of us manifests not just one physical life in any given century, say, but several, so as to gain that much more experience in a variety of roles involving different ages, nationalities and languages, sexual orientations, family roles, and so forth. [...]

[...] The sexual portion of his being also reflected the blockage in spontaneity. [...]

[...] When he left it, however, he was without such a structure, and when he did discuss such matters with the priests, they often had more pragmatic sexual interests in mind.

[...] The individual would say, for example, “I am Joe, and Jane, and Jim, and Bob.”⁶ There are physical variations of a sexual nature, so that on all levels identity includes the male and female. [...]

[...] I’m thinking about androgyny, of course, which is the concept of both male and female in one, and/or of hermaphroditism, wherein a person or animal possesses the sexual organs of both the male and the female. [...]

[...] All of those beliefs existed along with many unfortunate ones that were sexually oriented — those that dictated, for example, the traditional roles of man and wife, or man and woman. [...]

[...] There will be portions, therefore, dealing with sexuality, lesbianism and homosexuality, as well as the more recognized categories.

[...] It certainly did not seem that he was being overly cautious in any regard, and yet when his sexuality was perhaps most noticeable, he made sure he took up with a man, Walt, who could not take advantage of it—a very cautious step for all of its unconventional overtones.

[...] He disapproved of his own dancing, sometimes even of his sexual yearnings. [...]

[...] Here the symptoms served also, and cut down the possibility of sexual activity.

[...] His idea to have long hair (smile) at this particular point is beneficial, for it means to him the luxury of both sexuality and sense, sensual extravagance. [...]

(10:02.) The tale of Cinderella becomes a fantasy, a delusion, or even a story about sexual awakening, in Freudian terms. [...]

[...] This year alone, for instance, he’s already given a good amount of excellent information upon a number of nonbook topics — among them the interpretation of dreams; human, animal, and plant consciousness, and the interactions among them; human sexuality; viruses and inoculation; other realities he himself inhabits, and so forth. [...]

[...] You may express yourself through a different sexual nature, and you should realize that both are necessary. [...]