“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Sexual behavior obviously will be considered depraved by those most afraid of their own sensual natures. [...]

[...] You were not living clearly in the sensual, physical world, in that large amounts of energy were being used to repress physical communication.

You are closed to the intricate, voluptuous, sensuous, social experience of the animals, or even of the plants — not being able to perceive that different kind of biological emotion and belonging, that rich, sensual identification with earth, and cut off from a biologically oriented culture that is everywhere part and parcel of both plant and animal life.

The investigation will allow you to probe into the realities of conscious wakefulness, extending your sensual perceptions so that you can probe further outward into physical reality. [...]

[...] What a sensual barrage of activity—and how juicy it all is, since, relatively speaking (underlined), I sit here in my cozy cave, gnawing my supper bone, peacefully, with a rug at my feet. [...]

[...] Even on other planes the sensual nature and appreciation of the earthly habitat is maintained.

[...] Subsidiary potential egos can then seize upon and use the organism’s sensual and perceiving apparatus. [...]

[...] So once again we have a determinism that operates within our sensual and intellectual boundaries: another framework within which we ceaselessly attempt to understand “the meaning of life.”

The mind can interpret the experiences that the legs and the feet have, however, and by imaginatively using that sensual data can perceive the ant’s reality to some extent. [...]

You enjoy the living room for a nap because of its sensual reaches. [...]

[...] Your mind then forces your body to be in a state of constant alert — but more unfortunately, you train yourself to ignore your direct, sensual feedback in the present moment.

[...] Someday perhaps these envelope experiments can be correlated with various factors, sensual and otherwise. [...]

When I spoke of practicalities I meant direct experiences of a vivid nature, experience that would be at least as legitimate and valid as more ordinary sensual data. [...]

[...] My unimpeded, creative psyche intuitively knows that positive answers to its questions exist, that otherwise it wouldn’t bother to ask those questions within nature’s marvelous framework, that nature is alive and, as best we can sensually conceive of it, eternal. [...]

[...] I soon learned that in each case I had to rely upon my own sensual and psychic equipment to intuitively know what to believe, or to be moved by, sometimes to the point of tears. [...]

[...] That is, the strength of the inner sensual impact was as weakened and diluted as it would have been if what you heard was a cry through the outer ear that came originally from centuries already gone by.

[...] Physical reality is dependent upon your sensual perception of action, and that is all.

[...] A chemical imbalance in a physical body will also show itself as a corresponding distortion of sensual data. [...]

[...] An event that was connected with his sensual perception of this particular perfume.

[...] Now, even in his scientific studies he discovers that his senses have often misled him, his precious solid objects for example found to be solid only to his senses, an appearance given by the limitations of his sensual perceptions.

I also think that if asked Seth would point out that since the concept of quantum mechanics is based upon the idea that everything we “know”—matter, energy, our sensual information—is made up of quanta, or the interactions of insubstantial fields that in turn, and quite paradoxically, produce very active subatomic packets or particles, then quantum mechanics is at least analogous with his statements that basically the universe is composed of consciousness itself. [...]