“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(“The appearance of a neat, even, script, with small letters. The main paragraph forming a neat rectangular form. But neatly squared off. A block of matter.” Jane said this data referred to the printed envelope object, even though she used the word script instead of type. I was wondering if her use of the word script was a reference to the note sent in connection with the object, but Jane said no. She is not aware of the difference between the terms script, lettering, and type, for instance. She had an image here, of small even words on a rectangular shape; but my questioning could not elicit whether she could distinguish, here, between type, script, etc., on this rectangular shape. She merely knew there were words present.

(“I have the impression of a solid-appearing rectangular shape, in the center of a larger white object. The smaller one made up of small shapes which have been interpreted as script.” As stated, by script Jane meant print, or type. Jane said this is another reference to the object.

The appearance of a neat, even, script, with small letters. The main paragraph forming a neat rectangular form, but neatly squared off. A block of matter.

[...] I had barely looked at the page of test script when I prepared the double envelopes this afternoon.)

[...] The script deals with two people. [...]

[...] Necessary precautions refers to steps the couple take upon learning the imminent arrival of the girl’s father, although these are not outlined on the page of test script, but on both preceding and succeeding pages.

[...] You wrote the script.

(9:35.) Like a true absent-minded professor, the conscious self forgets all this, however, so when tragedy appears in the script, difficulty or challenges, the conscious self looks for someone or something to blame. [...]

(We estimate Parker had the book script in hand on Monday, June 23. Their card was written and mailed on June 27, Thursday, giving someone there three days to read the script, perhaps make some sort of evaluation, etc. [...]

[...] Now if you will look at the script when you receive it, you will see what I mean. [...]

[...] Read the script. [...]

[...] :] “Well, I have a question that I know I’m going to form after I read the script, and that is that your response was that my question was only meaningful in the terms that I use. [...]

[...] As I said in the notes for the deleted session of January 3, 1972, the script appears to be “The Sacred Script of Regulations.” [...]

(I had no idea of the script’s contents when I wrote it out on impulse. [...]

(Last night, April 10, 1964, just before I fell asleep, I had the following experience: My eyes were closed but I saw a sheet of paper filled with script that I recognized to be the handwriting of Dee Masters, my supervisor at the Arnot Art Gallery where I work in the afternoons.

[...] Unfortunately now I can’t put my hands on Barbara’s scrawled script but will find it and include it here. [...]

(A note: Late this morning Jane and I drove up to the Hoffman Street post office and mailed the corrected script of Personal Reality to Prentice-Hall. [...]

(This is the first session since the deleted one of January 7, which was held just before the script for Personal Reality came back to us. [...]

[...] It is as though Jane, in giving the material, is reading from an invisible script, so sure and straightforward is her delivery. [...]

[...] We went over what we had learned through Jane’s pendulum about an innocent remark of mine, that Jane didn’t have to ask Eleanor to return the script of Rich Bed after a two-week period. [...]

Scripts. [...]

(“Scripts.” [...]

(End of script; company arrived.)

[...] It contained her description of the method used in scripts she received, and the description fitted my experience so closely that she could have been speaking for me as well.

I mentioned this and read my small script to class at our next meeting, adding that I thought further instructions would have been given if the session had not been cut short. [...]

If Ruburt is allowing himself to be spontaneous, then he will spontaneously want to type his script, add to it, clean his house, go outside, see people sometimes, and not see them at other times. [...]

(Copy of the test page of script used for the 7th envelope test, in the 189th session, September 20,1965. [...]

[...] Jane called her publisher on February 8, as noted in the envelope material in the 234th session, then hurried to get the scripts and tape ready for the mail on February 10. [...]

(The important development for Jane was making the tape, and sending in the script on the Seth material. [...]

Science’s eyes, at least, have been largely closed, because it does not know how to read the personal script that is written everywhere in the passages of the chromosomes, or in the passages of a poem. [...]

[...] It appears to be “The Sacred Script of Regulations.” [...]

[...] Specifically, though, this is what happened: Quite suddenly in the predawn hours of December 11 she began to write an automatic script that purported to come from the artist Paul Cézanne, who lived from 1839 to 1906. [...]

[...] They begin to act out the drama in a script written by others — to which, however, they have acquiesced.