“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] The plans, as models, were picked up by inventors, scientists, and the like, and altered to their own specific directions, so that they emerged in your world not as copies but as something new. [...]

So do scientists and inventors often tune in to the world views of others — living or dead, in your terms — that correlate with their own intents, talents, and purposes.⁸

8. Seth’s information here, that scientists and inventors often tune in to the world views of other such individuals, at once reminded me that a similar long-term situation could have existed within the Butts family.

What your scientists are perceiving is the form, the camouflage form, which the projections of the quasars take within your system.

[...] Part of the nucleus exists within other systems with which your scientists simply are not familiar.

(Naturally the book has been endorsed by all the right scientists and organizations and reviewers. [...]

[...] He will then return toward physical reality in an area marked as REM sleep by your scientists, where physically oriented dream productions will be created, putting the knowledge he has gained into use.

Once scientists theorized the ether as the medium in which the physical universe existed.¹ Framework 2 is the psychological medium in which the consciousness of the world exists. [...]

[...] Scientists perceive only what appears within your system, and that often appears predictable.

[...] The artist, since he isn’t any kind of a scientist (even though he might be interested in science in general), attempts to grapple with the statement as best he can, in light of the feeling he has for what Seth is trying to say. [...]

As yet your scientists and physicists have a very limited concept of action. [...]

[...] There are other brain patterns for example than those discovered by your scientists. [...]

Scientists look for the objective most of all, and clear-cut cause and effect. [...]

What your scientists have learned about the physical genes barely scratches the reality of diversity, even physically. [...]

Scientists will begin to look for easier methods, and believe it or not, the first really important discovery will be made by an orthodox scientist out of pure desperation. [...]

[...] [See the 637th session in Chapter Nine.] Jane is receiving more letters from scientists these days, many of whom ask intriguing questions about the type of material covered in this session. [...]

(No book dictation was involved in Monday’s session for June 4, which was held for a scientist visiting Jane from the West Coast. [...]

[...] I am not here referring to Mass Events, which was indeed directed toward the condition of the world, but to matters—whatever they may be—where Ruburt feels a responsibility on his part (underlined) for me to dictate specific material that might answer questions he thinks scientists or others might have in mind about any given subject matter; for I write from a different viewpoint, and our material is of course not to be dictated in any (pause)important way by the statement of your official knowledge at any given time. [...]

The earth has gone through entire cycles unsuspected by your scientists. [...]

[...] And the scientists, for all their seeming independence, often simply found new intellectually acceptable reasons for unconsciously held emotional beliefs.

[...] It is known to your scientists that the chemical relationship between the personal physical self, and the chemical environment of the not-self is intimately connected.

Your scientists will very soon discover that the self has no real boundaries, but they will not think of the implications involved, on their own, for quite a while.

[...] This section also includes discussions on the True Dream-Art Scientist, the True Mental Physicist, and the Complete Physician, as well as material on subatomic particles and the spin of electrons in relationship to perceived reality.

[...] She doesn’t enjoy the protection a scientist does, who probes into a particular subject in depth, then makes a learned report on it from an “objective” position that’s safely outside the field of study. [...]

(Concerning the new product mentioned; John said that fellow workers recently visited the laboratories in Chicago and told him about one scientist in particular who was testing, or wanted to test, or experiment for problems of the central nervous system, but the budget insistence made this difficult. [...]

[...] The scientist will see the affair as relatively neutral —an event, however, in which man is certainly a pawn, caught by chance in a catastrophe that he would otherwise most certainly avoid. [...]