“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

But there are other states which the ego does not recall, states of activity that are presently beyond the reach of current scientific endeavors, and these states we shall discuss rather thoroughly.

[...] Obviously, such experiences cannot be proven in scientific terms. [...]

[...] But scientifically, this would not be proof of my existence as an independent personality who has survived death. [...]

[...] For any kind of scientific proof, of course, this would be a necessary preliminary.

In scientific terms, it doesn’t seem likely that the conflict between the two views will ever be resolved, or any decision reached that our universe may be an oscillating one, forever contracting and expanding. [...]

“He was involved in scientific endeavors both in Atlantis and Egypt, but he had no desire to continue those pursuits now. [...]

[...] Now each month she receives a little kit to be assembled; this in turn is used to carry out the scientific experiment for the month. [...]

[...] Within our national orientations, within our religious and secular, scientific and artistic structures, we are choosing to go to the extremes of “good” and “bad,” and to deal with the consequences, all stewing together in what seems like an impossible mix of reason and emotion, learning and joy, pain and violence, and life and death. [...]

[...] But, scientifically, this would not be proof of my existence as an independent personality who has survived physical death. [...]

Now I do not mind being nonscientific, and neither do any of you mind, because if all of your realities were confined to scientific theories you would have no realities at all, and neither would your fine scientists.³⁶ And in my time, I was also quite a dogmatic scientist. [...]

[...] For my own amusement, in recent years I’ve often tried to objectify that statement by equating the possible number of probable realities with the current scientific estimate of the number of atoms in the universe: 10⁷⁹, or a 1 followed by 79 zeroes. [...]

“The dream representing his grandfather symbolically allowed him to go back to the past in this life, to a time of severe shock—his grandfather’s death—which occurred when (Ruburt, at age 19) was beginning to substitute scientific belief for religious belief, wondering if his grandfather’s consciousness then fell back into a mindless state of being, into chaos, as science would certainly seem to suggest. [...]

[...] The concept was shifted over to the flawed self of scientific vintage. [...]

[...] But even these latest scientific theories are based upon ideas of a past, present, and future; their proponents do not consider that basically time is simultaneous—that the universe is being created now. We had an interesting discussion. [...]