“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] The rational approach works quite well in certain situations, such as mass production of goods, or in certain kinds of scientific measurements — but all in all the rational method, as it is understood and used, does not work as an overall approach to life, or in the solving of problems that involve subjective rather than objective measurements or calculations.

[...] You do not need to understand the properties of space in scientific terms, in order to use it very well. [...]

[...] Their reality cannot be probed by scientific devices, for dreams in this respect are as nebulous as the spirit, or soul, or inner self. [...]

[...] All he had to do was translate his experience into their terms, as before he felt he was expected to translate it into conventional religious, academic, or scientific terms.

In Framework 2 the mind affects the physical brain in a more complete and effective manner than usual, and can spark images, thoughts, or correlations that exist in a context outside of the time that is happening in Framework 1. Time happens at a certain regulated rate, then, obviously, in Framework 1. A certain amount of time is needed there to do a certain amount of work, and according to scientific dictates a specific amount of effort is required to perform different kinds of work.

[...] A scientific expedition may or may not be a violation. [...]

[...] The words are perceived consciously, but the concepts run directly counter to many usual beliefs—not just scientific ones, but to the beliefs that underlie the accepted establishment of the world.

[...] A sort of suspension of what you might call logic is necessary before such feats can be performed well enough for there to be a scientific proof, definite enough to be accepted. [...]

[...] You obviously did not fall for that to the extent Ruburt did —and all of this must be considered also in the light of the religious and scientific views, with Ruburt particularly, in which the spontaneous self was considered the psychological villain of the society and the individual. [...]

[...] We will get to his [scientific] questions. [...]

[...] How far can we go with any of the great social, scientific, religious ideas that are so peculiarly the offshoots of man’s mind?”

[...] They gave release, and they are giving release, to the emotions, and are thus rebelling against scientific intellectualism. [...]

[...] But, scientifically again, this would not be proof of my existence as an independent personality who has survived physical death. [...]

[...] As an idea expands, changing a world but taking up no space, and unperceived by your scientific instruments, so does the ultimate and instantaneous absolute gestalt, which you may if you prefer call God, exist and expand.

He was indeed involved in scientific endeavors, both in Atlantis and in Egypt, but he had no desire to continue those pursuits in this present existence. [...]

[...] The intellectual concepts will be enlarged in all areas—the scientific, metaphysical, psychological and psychic. [...]

[...] You are aware only of perceptions along the horizontal planes, and the more powerful your scientific instruments become the more you will be able to see. [...]

[...] I’d been thinking about those passages, and when Seth returned to the subject tonight I decided to have some fun with our accepted social and scientific establishments by writing this note.

[...] Using your terms again, and your scientific framework, when you look outward away from your planet, and when you assume that you are looking backward in time, you are simply looking into, or toward, what may be described for analogy’s sake, the center, or core, of an infinite sphere; which exists, you see, in your terms as far on the other side of the inner core, and in all directions. [...]

[...] Dr. Instream wanted scientific evidence for the existence of clairvoyance, and we all hoped we could supply it. [...]