“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] You gave yourselves as adults situations with your families, mainly with yours, in which you had to relate on an entirely different level and in a different kind of role. [...]

[...] According to Seth I lived in Denmark in the 1600’s. I was a painter as a younger man, then gave it up for the more respectable role of a farmer, at which I was quite successful. [...]

[...] But in certain terms she was the masculine center of the family, emotions or not, the aggressive one; and speaking conventionally now, your father (Robert Sr.) accepted the more passive creative role. [...]

5. In Volume 1 Seth described the role a nonphysical Stella Butts played in Jane’s and my house-hunting activities in Sayre, Pennsylvania, last April: See the 693rd session, with notes.

[...] I had a sense that the arm was moving almost by itself, somewhat uncoordinated, as if searching for its role with the body, or relearning for itself what it was for, what it could do. [...]

[...] Do not forget to reread our own material as often as you can—certainly the portions dealing with the roles of the conscious and unconscious minds. [...]

[...] When we are speaking of the psychological role of destinations, however, there is more to consider.

[...] (Pause.) You should not be involved now or in the near future in any communications endeavor that involves a taking on of other roles in any sort of acting. [...]

[...] You become the role. [...]

[...] Perhaps we’ll discover that they play as strong a role in Jane’s dilemma presently, as my wife’s Sinful-Self material. [...]

[...] For some time now I’d thought, often, that it could be that she wanted to be sick —that that was the role she’d chosen for this life, that in many ways all of our efforts to get out from under the symptoms were really beside the point. [...]

[...] You tried the role on for size, deciding finally that you could not accept it (my back trouble at 458, etc.). [...]

[...] [Our veterinarian has told us we have to wait until early next year before Mitzi’s littermate, Billy, can be neutered; he has some more growing to do first.] Seth’s recent material on animal consciousness has assuaged to some degree the guilt Jane and I feel at depriving the innocent cats of their reproductive roles. [...]

[...] I mentioned the guilt Jane and I feel because we’re depriving the cats of their reproductive roles in life, and because we don’t let them run free in the environment. [...]

Ruburt was correct in his introductory notes (for Mass Events) today—about the poet’s long-forgotten abilities, and his role. [...]

[...] Such a stand will automatically clear up all problems involving things like taxes, sex roles, or whatever—on both of your parts.

[...] An insight concerning my questions about the role of diseases came to me after supper, before I began typing this session, and I want to note it for possible future discussion. [...]

[...] And the session had gone into the question I’d noted yesterday at the end of the session, about the roles of health and disease in our world. [...]

[...] It had to have hidden in its psychological roots the bloody remnants of the struggle for survival that now cast it in its uneasy role. [...]

All of that was (underlined) exhausting, and you had your own role to play in those developments. [...]

All of the material given concerning Ruburt’s background and motives is highly legitimate, but it shows clearly why he was willing to take on this role. [...]

[...] We will also be considering the matter of free will and its role in individual value fulfillment.

[...] Jane appears to be swept up, fully involved in the role, and thoroughly enjoying it. [...]

[...] But when you take stock with the feelings we are describing as the emotional yardsticks, those feelings consider valid only the beliefs that go along with them—a traditional male role: the accumulation of money through traditional means—and they discount as legitimate the accumulation of knowledge or wisdom as a pursuit of life. [...]

[...] And in that area, you should also forget any idea of sex roles in conventional terms. [...]

(“I guess you’ve gone into my main question, about the sperm: If practically all of them are never going to fulfill their primary purpose, what other roles do they have in life?”)

[...] The whole self is the observer, and also a participator in many roles.

(“What was Bob McClure’s role in my dream of Jane walking last night?”)