“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(Naturally the book has been endorsed by all the right scientists and organizations and reviewers. [...]

[...] Seth came through right away. [...]

[...] You did say, several times, “You’ll be able to make it all right”—and that was also adequate and a good response.

(“That’s all right.”)

You are heading in the right direction. [...]

[...] This is always done, of course, with the idea that the right combination of simple ingredients (water, methane, ammonia, et al.) in the test tube, stimulated by the right kind of energy under just the right conditions, will automatically produce life. [...]

[...] Once it’s created, each school of thought takes upon itself, and often with great intellectual and emotional arrogance, the right to advance its own belief systems in the world at the expense of its rivals.

Fall together right!

[...] And while postulating that life is basically meaningless or goal-less [DNA doesn’t care what its host looks like, for instance], science fights awfully hard to convince everyone that it’s right — thus attaching the most rigid kind of meaning or direction to its professional views! [...]

(“Oh, about five million of them—but none right now.”)

[...] She felt all right while dictating, but tired as soon as break came. [...]

[...] The excitement of the chase is being substituted for the excitement that is required and demanded by the questioner, and rightly so because of the questioner’s psychological makeup.

[...] No severe (underlined) difficulty would result in any case, but an ugly bruise (pause), I believe by the right ear, and some twisting of a foot.

[...] Michaellen and I embraced and kissed as she said goodbye, and I wondered what her companions thought of such behavior between strangers, right out there under the light.

[...] He will be known as an excellent writer in his own right, and as one who produces our material, which he will be in a position to give freely to the world.

(Right after this exchange ended tonight at 9:03, Jane told me that she was going to dictate additional material “herself.” [...]

[...] In the English language we often don’t have the right word, one meaning male and female equally, with which to represent the species. [...]

[...] In a way, the cat is more nearly right than I am, because clock-time is an artificial device, and he’ll have nothing to do with it. [...]

[...] Why should we take it for granted that concepts are right, if they contradict our experience?

[...] Taking off at right angles involves another of your natural laws which are not actual laws but only seem to be from where you are. [...]

[...] The few times that the craft shoots off at right angles, it has managed to retain functions ordinary to it in its particular habitat.

[...] As usual Jane sat with her eyes closed, her right hand raised to them. [...]

(“Were we right about the ‘disturbance?’”)

(“Well,” I told Jane as we went to bed, “right now my idea is that we’ll have only short notes and no appendixes. [...]

[...] But right now, here’s a chronological list of our activities from June 17, 1974, when Seth finished his share of the work on Volume I of “Unknown Reality” to April 18, 1977 (today) when I mailed the corrected page proofs for that volume to Jane’s publisher.

[...] Her mail is accumulating at such a rate that I think it’s becoming a valuable social document in its own right. [...]

(“All right then, I guess we’ll take a short break.”

[...] Who’s to say it’s right or wrong, as long as one doesn’t injure another, or steal, and so on.