“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Mr. Van Over had much interesting information to impart; and also, much of what he had to say about the way mediums operate struck responsive notes within us, since we had seen the same things transpiring within, and in connection with, Jane.

Those attitudes are inbred in the smallest microscopic portions of the body — a part of each atom and cell and organ, and they serve to trigger all of the body’s responses that promote growth and fulfillment. [...]

[...] It acts the same in people, triggering the necessary bodily responses. [...]

(The booklet explains much — all of the multitude of sittings and standings and kneelings that we went through in the pews; the gifts carried to the altar by the Bumbalo grandchildren; the hymns we listened to; the selections from the Bible read by the various priests; the responses we gave to the appropriate passages recited by the head priest, who read from the Gospel of John and other Biblical passages.

If your Friday get-togethers have become boring, it is to a large extent because you have both allowed them to do so, and not taken the lead in directing the conversations along more responsible lines. [...]

[...] Jane wrote the outline for it in less than an hour, and says the process of intuition responsible for it was much like that which led to her production of the book of poetry discussed in the 227th and 228th sessions in Volume 5.

[...] The fact that this does occur shows that the systems of perception are not a part of over-all structure biologically, but learned secondary responses. [...] Inner stability of response is suddenly swept away. [...]

[...] Indiscriminate use of the psychedelic drugs can severely shake up learned patterns of response that are necessary for effective manipulation within physical reality; break subtle connections and you disturb electromagnetic functions. [...]

All I have is the feeling that something was not appreciated, and that an error might have been somehow responsible.

[...] As mentioned on page 7, this is an instance where Jane received internal visual data from Seth, and had the responsibility of interpreting it correctly. [...]

(“and that an error might have been somehow responsible.” [...]

[...] Seth has already touched upon such questions in the deleted sessions that follow, especially those for April 30 and May 2, and extends his coverage of them this evening in response to my latest queries. [...]

Your father was inventive, his creativity in that line you felt dwarfed by family responsibility. [...]

[...] They are individuals who have taken upon themselves the responsibility for this role. [...]

[...] As he wondered, I very briefly responded to the effect that since we come from such different perspectives, it is actually quite difficult to give your scientist what I would consider a full response. [...]

[...] When the death was not acted out in drama form—this you are familiar with, we shall not go into it here—then instead the mother pretended to have an attack of one kind or another, and she told the child that the child was directly responsible.

You will both be pleased with the book itself, and with its response. [...]

[...] You saw the response in his leg this evening. [...]

[...] And the responsibilities you feel this entails.

The New York trip (in August), his response to it, was largely responsible for the setback. [...]

Only those who choose to take on the responsibility of teaching will return. [...]

([Mark:] “Then if you have a responsibility it should be an opportunity to develop yourself, not a self-sacrifice?”)

My emotional response however was quite legitimate. [...]

(I can say that when Seth/Jane paused before delivering this last line, I had the feeling that some kind of inner shift in control had taken place; that Seth rather than Jane was responsible for the last line of material. [...]

This session is obviously in response to this afternoon’s troublesome discussion.

Life, however, is far too profound and multitudinous, and requires great depths of emotional response and action that could never be satisfied adequately by any given set of circumstances, however favorable.

[...] In a mood of self-pity there is indeed an almost perverted luxury, the luxury of despair, for despair says: There is nothing I can do, and relieves you of any responsibility for change. [...]

[...] Many individuals reacting to a given event may do so by combining their energy to produce one major action-event in response.