“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] I agree wholeheartedly with the concepts Seth presents here, while realizing that they run counter to many accepted religious, social, and scientific dogmas. [...]

We will save that for our religious chapter. [...]

[...] The leaders of religious cults, like that of Jonestown, overexaggerate grandiose ideals of brotherhood and love, for example (as Seth has mentioned), while often forbidding the natural expression of love on the part of one individual for another — assaulting family affiliations and so forth. [...]

China and Egypt, lives in various religious capacities, however, without the necessary sense of responsibility. [...]

[...] The social and cultural aspects, and even the religious ones, automatically inhibit such experiences from childhood on. [...]

[...] Now Iran is ruled by the Shiites, and is religiously oriented; Iraq is ruled by the Sunnis, and is more secular and socialistic. Iranian leaders emphasize the religious aspects of the war, Iraq the ethnic. [...]

Through all of our challenges, we were aware of at least some of the incredible variety of positive and negative world events in the news—the bombings and the peace talks, the sports contests and the religious controversies, the national strikes and the latest developments in the arts. [...]

[...] These closely followed man’s religious and social groupings. [...]

[...] Their severe religious training made them feel that any luxury was sinful —and so they set about to upset their own apple cart. [...]

Under Prentice’s auspices, however, you also have Parker Books — books that are devoted to quite anti-establishment ideas and concepts — to all brands of psychic, scientific, or religious eccentricities, given to matters that contradict the establishment and challenge it at every point. [...]

[...] To a large degree they were largely the result of a lack of understanding of himself, brought on by his old religious beliefs of responsibility, then applied to his own creativity. [...]

There are variations, and actually James has explained the natural background there, for it is all tied in with religious, psychological, and scientific beliefs.

[...] The church provided a family of sorts, but that family also was dependent upon religious obedience. [...]

[...] They had to do with my religious upbringing, my joy and appreciation of my creative abilities, and my fear of using them at the same time, lest they lead me astray—or lead my followers astray. [...]

Now unless you come to terms with your own doubts about yourselves then you will have no idea what faith is and when I use the word faith, I am not speaking in religious terms. [...]

[...] Before our sessions, he was so disillusioned that he would not even consider any questions dealing with “religious matters.”

[...] Mass religious movements have for centuries fulfilled that purpose, in giving man some plan to be followed. [...]

[...] He played church and state against each other, made an ass of the Pope whenever he could, and was deeply involved in the social, political, and religious fervor of those days. [...]

[...] Now his own background, with its self-denial and early religious esthetic training, also played its part, you see.

She sees herself supported in a religious sense by conventional figures from the Bible. [...]

[...] This in turn is “later” discarded for one still less physical, but the idea of the form is so important a symbol that you carry it through all of your religious literature, and stories of hereafter.