“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] In that regard the books are powerful, and their impact cannot be ascertained in mundane ways. [...]

[...] You must convince yourselves that the point of power is now, in all regards.

[...] (To Rachel.) The answer in regard to your pussycat must come to you intuitively and it is available. [...]

Now my hearty regards and best wishes to you all and do not worry. [...]

Now I give you my regards and to our visitors and now tell Ruburt what I said. [...]

Problems involving the nature of consciousness, the nature of reality and problems regarding the responsibility of consciousness to All That Is. [...]

I “see” the reincarnated aspects, the various manifestations taken in that regard. [...]

My heartiest regards, and a fond good evening.

(I regard the test as quite good at this stage, especially the reference to me via initials, and the note, something two times, and a landscape of a landscape. [...]

My fondest regards to you both.

[...] I may or may not return, according to those rhythms of which I have spoken—but in an important regard I am indeed present from the time of my first greeting in an afternoon until the time that you leave. [...]

(9:10.) Psychic abilities, as such, were relatively unimportant to Ruburt when the Sinful Self was receiving all of this instruction, so in that regard they, taken alone, were simply seen in a somewhat worse light than the creative abilities. [...]

(I should write a few notes regarding last night’s session, before I forget. [...]

[...] Put simply, your thoughts can be regarded as invisible viruses, carriers, sparks setting off reactions not only within the body but the entire physical system as you know it.

[...] I will have more to say in that regard, and also about your question concerning the gull, but for now I want to make certain specific connections. [...]

[...] It will be of help, then, if you each reinforce the other’s sense of self-approval, particularly in regard to your artistic and psychic abilities. [...]

[...] The telling itself makes the affair seem complex—but whether or not you are dealing with private behavior, with the treatment of one person in regard to his or her own impulses, or whether you are dealing with a mass event of political nature, involving the enforced blockage of impulses on the part of one group toward another, you are necessarily cutting down on the exercise of free will. [...]

[...] The nuances, which are important, appear in many groups of sessions, given in the past, and also include his reaction to attitudes of your own, which to some extent helped form and solidify his own ideas in those regards. [...]

I should add that Ruburt’s decision to continue eating in a normal manner was an excellent one, and the condition is being remedied in that regard. [...]

[...] This is tied in of course with your experience in general regarding the members of the medical profession, and here symbolically you strip the doctor of his assumed authority, and see him more like a hired man—a plumber or mechanic, perhaps, but devoid of any deep philosophical bent. [...]

In the truest regard, your life is provided for you by these spontaneous processes. [...]

You yourself were also not willing to face consciously certain possible consequences directly, for example—of television appearances; possibilities of fame, etc., and you were ambiguous in that regard. [...]

[...] In that regard, in your framework of action you choose to “speak” one event rather than another. [...]

While identity and consciousness are regarded as the result of primarily physical processes, then the nature of personality will never be understood.

My heartiest regards to you both. [...]

[...] It did take Ruburt some time to fully understand how his work might perhaps be regarded. [...]

The psychic public image (long pause) is a composite, of course, composed in your minds largely from your correspondence, and in that regard you both often exaggerate certain elements over others. [...]

[...] In that regard, for example, James was quite correct: certain religious societies interpreted the theme so that it read “evolution of the soul”; but there is no soul in Darwinian theory and hereditary, and certainly none in the environment. [...]

[...] My heartiest regards and a fond good evening.

(Very long pause at 10:21.) The statements I have made regarding the innate nature of the spontaneous self can be of the greatest service if they are accepted. [...]

[...] Tonight, I told her, Seth said nothing at all about what I regard as the central point of conflict—the conflict between her Sinful Self, so-called, and the spontaneous self. [...]