“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

When you refute such emotions or become terrified of them, you impede the flow of feeling from one moment to the other. You set up dams. Any emotion will change into another if you experience it honestly. Otherwise you clog the natural movement of your entire system.

To refute your reality in time, therefore, results in your being stuck in time and obsessed by it. Accepting your integrity in time allows the body to function until its natural end, in good condition, free from those distorted, invisible concepts about age. If you believe that youth is the ideal and struggle for it while simultaneously believing that old age must involve infirmities, then you cause an unnecessary dilemma, and hasten aging according to the negative aspects of your mind.

Philosophies that teach denial of the flesh must ultimately end up preaching a denial of the self and building a contempt for it, because even though the soul is couched in muscle and bone it is meant to experience that reality, not to refute it.

[...] Seth’s main concern was to refute that concept.

[...] He had schooled himself to refute any opposing impulses, and built his life along those lines from a young age.

[...] You have been told to experience your feelings and not to deny them, so you are not to use the point of power as an attempt to refute the reality of your emotions at any given time.

[...] Some aspects of life may be ignored or even refuted for a time while others are focused upon. [...]

[...] You may try to operate as if it did not exist, or even try to refute it. [...]

[...] The story was largely a refutation of an article concerning drugs in Elmira, published by a national tabloid, the National Mirror. [...]

[...] The process can be discussed from many viewpoints; Jane and I think that such inquiries could easily “evolve” [to make a pun] into a book, either to bolster Seth’s ideas on the subject, for instance, or to refute them. [...]