“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] I didn’t have time to observe Lorraine’s reaction.)

[...] There is no overall general reaction, therefore, in the terms of your question. [...]

[...] This results in a claustrophobic reaction that is lessened with the coming of your spring.

[...] In the 715th session, Seth also lets fall some rather humorous comments on Jane’s own mixed reactions when she first encountered such hints of the “multidimensionality of your beings.”

[...] Perhaps it was her poetic art of expression that helped me identify so strongly with her emotions, but I suddenly felt that even I had never really understood the myriad depths of her challenges and her reactions to them. [...]

(To me at 9:14:) “I will also have comments concerning your own reactions, and I suggest—but only suggest—that again your usual two sessions a week be held, as a framework for the therapeutic endeavors.

[...] It was to be some time before I completely trusted myself and my own reactions again. [...]

[...] Your own illness, immediately before our sessions, was unfortunately necessary, in that it made you question the nature of your mental reactions toward physical and psychological events.

[...] The members of the class were being asked their reactions when Seth interrupted with the following observations:)

[...] I just say these things to watch your reactions. [...]

[...] I certainly would not want to get him angry at me, as I am so familiar with his explosive reactions.

[...] While tasting the milk during break, however, Jane “herself” had had no such reaction.)

[...] Many are born the same day of any given year, and generally within the same time period — but individually the inner triggering may be far different, so that while the overall conditions at birth may appear more or less the same, the inner reactions to them will vary widely. [...]

[...] I am amused at your reactions, and my own... [...]

The fact that the fearful ego was beginning to tighten explains your reaction to the exercises. [...]

The individual’s ability to receive these impressions of which we have been speaking, and his ability to translate them and to construct them, is all determined by his own personal psychic background in past existences and in the present one, and by his own inner conception of himself, the physical universe, his place in it, and by his inner reactions to ideas.

[...] This excerpt is from the private session of November 11, 1979: “… the same kind of reactions, however, are involved in all activities, and it is sometimes frustrating for me that you cannot perceive the fascinating facets of any event. [...]

[...] Therefore it became much more feasible to approach earthmen during their dream state, when their natural fear reactions were somewhat minimized, and where the danger to the visitors was far less.

[...] It involved a foresight hardly imaginable, and I repeat that you had your part in the initial reaction, as did every entity who lived or will live upon the earth; and here we are getting into something rather difficult but certainly no mystery.

[...] How strange, I’ve found myself thinking, that Joe, say, doesn’t see our environment in artistic terms, since what I see is so plain to me. But then, I tell myself, Joe has a method of cognition that’s quite natural to him. If he loves flowers, for instance, he may enjoy more of a sheer emotional reaction through the appreciation of a rose than I can.

The sensations are a physical demonstration of an inner sense reaction on a psychic basis, or level, which you have not yet achieved, and cannot be expected to. [...]