“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

As I have told you often, your body reacts to your thoughts. [...]

[...] He constantly picks up and reacts to your moods, subconscious as well as conscious, interprets them, and translates them into physical realities, because of your psychic closeness and his strong telepathic abilities.

(To Sally.) You project your own distrust upon other people and then react to it and so you close yourself off from those feelings of trust that others would express for you. [...]

The inner senses will also react to suggestion. [...]

(Seth continues to describe the ways in which various kinds of consciousness react to painful stimuli, ending up with a statement that at deepest cellular levels, all sensations and stimuli are instantly, automatically and joyfully accepted, regardless of their nature. [...]

[...] … As an individual changes his physical situation through reacting to it, so he changes his interior or psychic situation in the same way. [...]

[...] This is what you picked up and reacted to. You did not react to the attitudes of others in those families who “had to put up with those conditions,” because to you they are natural.

I don’t mean to imply that I feel myself entirely released from every worry and fear, only that I now know we do have the freedom to change ourselves and our environment, and that in a very basic manner, we ourselves form the environment to which we then react. [...]

When I’m reacting emotionally and Rob gives me a reasonable reply, it always puts me on the defensive. [...]

[...] He wants a repeat, but he fears he will not get it, simply because he wants it so badly, and the student reacts to this subconscious inhibiting factor.

This characteristic way of interpreting perceived data, and of reacting to it, is not as constant as it appears to be however. [...]

(Jane didn’t react overly much to any of this, beyond implying at least a general sort of agreement. [...]

[...] How can we be, if through the ages we’ve created that history and nature against which we react? [...]

[...] This does not mean that in a beloved person you react only to your own idealized self, for you are also able to see in the other, the beloved’s potential idealized self. [...]

[...] And yet, I thought, psychologists talk about projection and transference by which we project our fears outward to another person or object and then react to them.

[...] Ruburt’s experience is specifically more obvious, yet your mother and father each reacted in their own ways to the authority of the world as they understood it. [...]

In that framework, even the emotions of love and exaltation are seen as no more than the erratic activity of neurons firing (pause), or of chemicals reacting to chemicals. [...]

[...] In Dreams he’s already said (in Session 909) that the human species has an “amazing interplay between genetic preciseness and genetic freedom,” and (in Session 910) that “your genetic structure reacts to each thought that you have, to the state of your emotions, to your psychological climate.” [...]

[...] You have not reacted to any negative influences in that regard, but in a fashion through your creativity helped reconcile what were conflicting elements.

[...] I imagine I react to it in somewhat the same way that Jane does to her “responsiveness.”)

(11:10.) In this case the other person has no idea as to why you reacted in such a fashion, and is deeply hurt. [...]