“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

2. Quite a few of the diagrams I drew for Jane’s Adventures in Consciousness (which is to be published by Prentice-Hall in the spring of 1975) illuminate Seth’s material in this paragraph. [...]

[...] For Chapter 19 of Politics (which is to be published in 1976) Jane transcribed from her library, in part: “If you imagine the official numbers 1 to 10 in a row, then there would be an infinite number of unofficial 1’s hidden in the 1 you saw, and an infinite number of spaces between the official 1 and 2. The position of the 1 on the paper would represent our sense-data world, while the invisible 1’s behind the official 1 would represent the official 1’s hidden values and infinite probabilities.”

[...] Prentice-Hall will publish the book late next year.

(Before the session I told Jane, half jokingly, that she should publish a Seth Reader, said volume to contain Seth material on many subjects, presented in a rather more simplified way.)

[...] I said that I didn’t want the extra stress involved with the tape deal, that we’d dealt with our publisher for many years, and that I didn’t look forward to being in an adversarial position vis-à-vis them. [...]

[...] There’s also copyright infringement, since some of the class sessions have been published. [...]

[...] On the 19th we received from our publisher for checking the proofs of the index for Volume 2 of “Unknown” Reality, then two days later the proofs for the front matter of Psyche arrived. [...]

[...] Anyhow, we’d have to check to see whether our publisher is set up to market a book that quickly, or would even want to.”

(At times Jane and I have speculated about eventually publishing the class sessions—with the permission of those involved, of course—but have been so busy we haven’t tried to follow through.

[...] This is why his most effective and publishable fiction was in the form of fantasy.

2. Published in The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, March, 1958.

[...] Unfortunately the knowledge that his book will be published, while bringing him much satisfaction, has also served to remind him of the manner in which he fears many might look upon both our sessions and his past endeavors in this field.

[...] I’ve always wanted to see the poem published; I think it very rich in both subject matter and visual content.

[...] In class, Seth discussed Charles Darwin and his theory of evolution,⁷ and that material, some of which wasn’t published in the 582nd session is the source for my second group of excerpts:)

[...] As noted with the quotations given in Note 13, eventually this material will be published in its entirety as part of a Seth book; perhaps then it can be used as a guide for the sort of investigation just mentioned. [...]

[...] But to briefly paraphrase material Jane came through with not long ago [and which, again, will eventually be published]: “How does one deal with new facts that undermine old facts, in whatever field of endeavor? [...]

7. Charles Darwin (1809–1881) published On the Origin of Species in 1859. [...]

(“What do you think of the report of Jane’s publisher on the sale of her ESP book? “By telephone today Jane learned from her publisher, F. Fell, that the small first printing of her ESP book has sold out, even before publicity on the book has been launched. [...]

[...] In the long run you are both better off that Ruburt’s publishing house did not take her book at this time. [...]

[...] In case you wondered Ruburt’s weekend fling with the furniture was a result of various things—an inner, unrecognized knowledge that her publisher would put off the book for now, and a burst of doubt over these sessions coupled with worries concerning your parents.

Your letter, by the way, to the publisher, was an excellent move on your part. [...]

[...] On October 17, Jane got a letter from her publisher, outlining details for the first full-page ad that he has placed in a national publication for the ESP book. [...]

(We were very busy with publishing affairs over the weekend. [...]

[...] During our talk last night, I told Jane that we’d made a serious error in deciding to publish it in two volumes, with extensive notes—that there were obviously other courses of action we could have taken. [...]

When Rebellers was published your attitude was a poor one, but it was drastically received by our friend, who could not understand it and felt then and there that you no longer loved him as you had. [...]