“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

The law in your country says that you are innocent until proven guilty. In the eyes of that law, then, you are each innocent until a crime is proven against you. There usually must also be witnesses. There are other considerations. Often a spouse cannot testify against the other. Opportunity and motive must also be established.

Religious laws deal with sin, whether or not a crime is committed (pause), and religious concepts usually take it for granted that the individual is guilty until proven innocent. And if you have not committed a crime in fact, then you have at least sinned in your heart — for which, of course, you must be punished. A sin can be anything from playing cards to having a sexual fantasy. You are sinful creatures. How many of you believe that?

[...] If a hypothesis is “proven true,” then it cannot be proven false — or, of course, it was never true to begin with.

[...] As a rule such theories are proven “true” by the simple process of excluding anything else that seems contradictory, and so generally your scientific theories carry the weight of strong validity within their own frameworks.

[...] (Not to mention that innumerable experiments have proven that “physical matter” isn’t solid or objective at all, but “only” energy!) We have, then, the paradox of mind denying its own reality, let alone its importance. [...] It isn’t falsifiable; that is, it cannot be stated under what precise conditions the mind-brain duality could be proven false. [...]

[...] It is of course very difficult for you, because (pause) the deepest truths cannot be physically proven. [...]

[...] It simply means it is not structured in the usual way—and it even means that in Framework 1 it cannot be proven—for what can be proven in Framework 1 must always be relative.

[...] Many people still continue to follow the very same dogmas that seemed to have proven themselves wrong; the personage comes up with a newer excuse, or a newer date, and things go on as before.

[...] Aside from the question of whether “evolution” in ordinary linear terms has been scientifically proven [concerning which point Jane and I have many reservations], we were drawn to the article because we thought its “factual” information might eventually supplement some of Seth’s material for “Unknown” Reality. [...]

[...] This has proven to be quite effective, and I can feel Jane’s limbs relax as I work on them. [...]

[...] When it was proven to him, I was satisfied. Whether it is proven, in those terms, to you or not bothers me not one iota. [...]

Now that I have proven how jovial I am, you may all take a break! [...]

[...] What could not be proven in the laboratory was presumed not to exist at all.

[...] Any material proof of this sort is extremely difficult, since oftentimes you pick up a generalized picture of coming events, so to speak, and the words that you use are so literal that they cannot convey the whole picture sufficiently enough so that validity can be proven, in your terms. [...]

[...] The ego therefore is pleased when information is proven correct. [...]

[...] Jastrow cites the big bang theory of the creation of the universe as a proven fact, whereas it’s only the latest theory, as far as we know. [...]

[...] It was advertised in the National Enquirer: “A Doctor’s Proven New Home Cure for Arthritis,” by Giraud W. Campbell, Doctor of Osteopathy.Jane began to read through it at once, out of curiosity if nothing else, and discovered that it called for a very rigid diet. [...]

[...] Some other companies might well have exerted even more pressure to keep Ruburt writing along certain proven lines. [...]

I’ll digress a moment to note that it’s quite obvious that when conducted by skilled therapists past-life regression has proven to be of great benefit to certain individuals. Whether or not reincarnation has been proven objectively, the belief structures surrounding that concept, or even the idea of it, have served very well as a forum within which certain present-life challenges have been worked out, through the therapists’ use of hypnosis, allegory, association, symbolism, and other very respectable methods.

[...] By its very nature a future life cannot be proven—records checked, and so forth. [...]

[...] Used in a projection, the same intensity of energy would allow results that could be proven without doubt, and accepted without reservation.

Then, you thought, you could be quite free to use your mind and your other abilities, and no one could say a thing because you could always say, “Obviously, I’ve proven my womanhood, and I’m free to use my mind.”

[...] They cannot be proven or disproven. [...]

[...] It is fashionable to say that some scientific laws can be proven at microscopic levels, where, for example, small particles can be accelerated far beyond [their usual states]. [...]