“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] In a manner of speaking he is working out problems for both of you. [...]

[...] Any problems that were not faced in this life will, however, be faced in another one. [...]

[...] We project our inner knowledge “outward” in distorted fashion; thus on a global scale we thrash about with our problems of war, overpopulation, and dwindling natural resources, to name but a few.

(If impressions can attach themselves to the test object itself, they can attach themselves to any other object; so once again it appears that the problem for Jane is one of discrimination. [...]

His problems are cosmic in their proportions, or so it seems to him. [...]

[...] Overall there is also the world situation to be taken into consideration — the status of the species on the planet, in which, say, overpopulation problems will bring about death to insure new growth.

[...] With you both the problem is somewhat different than it might be with others. [...]

[...] I remarked that most of our world’s problems seem to result from Framework-1 thinking, that our species is so steeped in such conscious-mind behavior—locally, nationally, and worldwide—that there seems little chance of our ever breaking out of that iron pattern. [...]

[...] But I still thought it very strange for the eyes to cause problems if the body was in the process of healing itself, as Seth has so often said recently is the case. [...]

[...] I have not lived many, many lives without a deep understanding of your own kind of reality and problems, but I have not had many other existences that are not physical without a deep understanding of the nature of reality as it is not apparent to you now. [...]

[...] You should also have a series of dreams that work out various aspects of the same problem for this is but one isolated point of your feelings. [...]

[...] Whenever evidential material has been given, my dear friend, and it has been given to help others deal with a problem that was of vital interest, it has not been given as a demonstration, and it has not been given to prove anything to anyone. [...]

[...] I would not have you stew over that with all of your other problems (to Bette). [...]

Your apparent laws of the universe have been broken in isolated instances often enough so that this point should certainly be clear, and yet your scientists constantly ignore such problems.

[...] Because of that fear she had developed certain problems that were severe enough to keep her from working at her profession in the law.

(Seth dealt with this problem to some extent in the 194th session, when he spoke concerning the article on dreams in The New Yorker magazine for September 18,1965.)

Some of this material will automatically answer many questions with which you have been concerned, problems with which your scientists are now dealing. [...]

[...] The problem will never arise. [...]

If this seems to involve you in a problem with morality, then let me add here that such information, on its own, unless handled with utmost care, would immediately involve the negative suggestion that could lead easily to the very condition that we hope she avoids.

(“Do you think it’s anything we should know in dealing with this problem?”)