“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] They can permit you to become acquainted with other inward orders of events, and the rich bed of probabilities from which your physical existence emerges.

[...] They will, these dream expeditions, throw great light on the nature of personal daily experience, and they will also provide personal knowledge of the ways in which probabilities operate.

[...] The particular string of probable actions that you call your official experience does not just dangle, then, out in space and time — it interweaves with other such strands that you do not recognize. [...]

[...] The rich tapestry of probable actions from which you choose your official life becomes just as invisible. [...]

[...] These represent, of course, probable events. [...]

There were probable Christs, in other words, living in your terms at that time. [...]

[...] He was a probable personality of the Paul portion of the Christ entity.

[...] All probabilities point in its direction, however, for the inner impetus is already forming the events.

[...] All probabilities have their reality in notime, and the creative accomplishments that take place within notime generate all the probable realities that will ever exist or have existed within the various time systems. [...]

You should be able to tune in, so to speak, on some future probable events, I believe in image form, after a few attempts. [...]

[...] Further in the background a less immediate but still probably unfortunate reply.

[...] Much mist would represent the fact that probabilities had not yet cohered enough so that any certain answer could be given.

[...] In all of this probabilities are involved, so in all points of the past he touched points of probable healings. [...]

[...] In one probability you did the same thing yourself. [...]

[...] To operate adequately in your highly specific field (pause), an almost infinite amount of information must be instantly assimilated, probabilities calculated, and certain balances maintained of which you are not even aware.

[...] It then forms beliefs about reality, and these are used in the dream state as one of the main yardsticks, so to speak, that activate the emergence of certain probable events rather than others.

[...] Your convictions help you sift out probable actions appearing as dreams, of course — from others that do not concern you.

(12:02.) In a very limited and fumbling manner this is hinted at through the use of computers, where you try to assess “future probabilities” and act accordingly in your present. [...] The brain would become aware of more of the mind’s knowledge, and the probabilities of future events would be made consciously available.

[...] To utilize future probable events, the physical brain would be forced to enlarge its function while keeping the individual in clear relationship with the present moment of power, or corporeal effectiveness. [...]

[...] Many people have at one time or another changed their present behavior in response to the advice of a “future” probable self, without ever knowing they have done so.

(12:21.) In other terms, the self that you have projected into the future is sending you back encouragement from a probable reality that you still can create. [...]

[...] As I show at the end of this appendix, Seth allows for a much greater range of simultaneous origins; in our reality these imply growth and development out of that “basic” group of species for the most part, with multidimensional purposes operating inside an enhanced time scheme that includes probabilities, reincarnation, counterparts,²² precognition, and other concepts, meanings, and beliefs. [...] Probabilities aside, when Seth talks about cells [or their components] recombining as parts of plant or animal forms, as he does in the 705th session, Jane and I don’t take that to mean the evolution, or alteration, of one species into another — but that a unity of consciousness pervades all elements in our environment, whether “alive” or “dead.” With the concept of probabilities in mind, however, much of the “thrust for development and change” that Seth also mentions as existing inside all organisms, could just as well take place in those other realities. [...]

(Our beliefs and intents cause us to pick “from an unpredictable group of actions,” or probabilities, those that we want to happen, as Seth tells us in the 681st session in Volume 1; therefore, from my physically oriented probability the considerable work I’ve put into this paper is an examination of evolution in connection with a number of Seth’s concepts. [...]

[...] According to her, if man didn’t emerge from the animals, there were certainly close relationships involved — a dance of probabilities between the two, as it were. [...] Although she left Appendix 6 unfinished, it contains many ideas worth more study: “Some of the experiments with man-animals didn’t work out along our historic lines, but the ghost memories of those probabilities still linger in our biological structure … The growth of ego consciousness by itself set up both challenges and limitations … For many centuries there was no clear-cut differentiation between various aspects of man and animal … there were parallel developments in the emergence of physical man … there were innumerable species of man-in-the-making in your terms….” [...]

[...] Neither statement would be precisely correct in any case, because your present is a poised balance affected as much by the probable future as the probable past.”

(This session followed a class discussion on reincarnation and probabilities. [...]

[...] Time has open ends in all directions or such a thing as probabilities would not exist. [...]

[...] You can tune in to certain probabilities and predict “that they will occur,” but free will always operates. [...]

[...] In the operation of probabilities this has great significance, for this means that you change and affect all events, and that your books are a delightful fiction that tell you only your current ideas about the past.

[...] Any one event implies the existence of probable events which do not “emerge,” which are not “spoken.” Physical world events therefore rest upon the existence of implied probable events. [...] Other probabilities, therefore, emphasize events that are only implied (as pauses) in your reality, so that your physical events become the implied probable ones upon which other worlds reside.

[...] The thought may be relatively meaningless to any given probable self and it may be very fleeting. The probable selves in one way or another will react, forming other action-events. [...]

A thought experienced by you is also experienced by your probable selves, you see, in one way or another. [...]

I will bid you all good evening, but before I do I want you all to know that every teacher, myself included, Edgar, has private projects in which they are very interested and mine happens to be probabilities. Therefore, when you are doing your little experiments in class other teachings are being given to you at the same time that will allow you to more easily contact your probable selves. [...]

[...] Now when you are ready, and it is work in probabilities is a prerequisite, you will be able to meet and remember so that we can carry on class twice a week. [...]

[...] You sensed the shape of the probability that is now your life, that is now your life together (intently). And from that probable future in your past, your creative abilities were accelerated. [...]

[...] I must insist once more that you take probabilities into consideration. [...]

[...] Those events were necessary, or events very much like them, if, granting probabilities, the two of you were eager to have years of satisfying life and work. [...]

[...] The strong impetus however is on the part of your probable self and yourself. [...] In that probable reality however your doctor friend did not meet a probable Jane.

[...] You should also probably make extra note(s) to recall your dreams in case the meeting is not as conscious and deliberate as you would like.

[...] Knowing intuitively those changes which must come about in your future, they try to bring them about by appearing in your past; though to them your future and the past are the same they must still work within probabilities, you see, and what they are doing is affecting probabilities within your system. [...]

[...] This is a very good session, dealing with probabilities, personal consciousness of many kinds, electrical realities, etc. [...]

[...] Yours is obviously a probable system to other fields also touched by the field of probabilities.

[...] Probably my own attitude and mood today, of course — yet the session could have been any one of a similar kind that Jane had given in the last ten years. [...]

[...] Without doubt, my own frustrations and resentments were surfacing probably for my own safety.

[...] In the case of probable realities the focus of energy has always been different from your own. [...] It is highly difficult however for you to contact your own probable personalities.

[...] The probable realities of which I have spoken are separated from your own, not in terms of space but in terms of energy focus. [...]

These probable realities exist within what may be generally termed your own sphere of activity, your own plane. [...]

[...] Probably another general reference to the object, in that the object’s author, Caroline Keck, was associated with both the Brooklyn Museum and the Arnot Art Gallery. [...]

[...] Probable man represents alternate man from your viewpoint, alternate versions of the species. [...] In out-of-body states many people have encountered probable selves and probable realities. [...] The private psyche contains within itself the knowledge of its own probabilities, and it contains a mirror in which the experience of the species can at least be glimpsed.

[...] It becomes probable in your system but seeks its own “level,” and becomes actualized as it falls into place in another reality whose “coded sequence” fits its own. [...]

[...] In Session 684 (in Volume 1) he said at 10:07: “Your body’s condition at any time is not so much the result of its own comprehension of its ‘past history’ as it is of its own comprehension of future probabilities. [...]

“Billy belonged in another probability, and in a fashion you switched probabilities for him, though without his consent, when you took him from the animal shelter, where he would have soon been ‘done away with.’ His three years with you represented a grace period for him…. He did not make this probability his own because of what you may call ‘other commitments’ — or rather, other purposes.

(On Tuesday the veterinarian told us by telephone that Billy was better, that “probably” we could take him home the following afternoon; I was to call before making the drive across town, though. [...]

[...] Could the “disease” ever move from whatever probability it now occupies back into our own reality some day, thus appearing to have regenerated itself? [...]

[...] [Several people who wrote to you] picked up on that probability….” [...]

(During a class experiment to find the reality of our own probable selves, Seth came through.)

[...] For to some extent or another, stronger with some of you and weaker in others, you have exchanged with your probable selves, and, in your terms, you are in the wrong room. [...]