“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(Seth was in a particularly good mood this evening, after the long holiday break, and because of the presence of witnesses. [...]

[...] He would not be aware of your presence. [...]

[...] But as Jane has said, things are “calmer” psychically when we’re by ourselves: In trance or out, she can concentrate upon the work at hand, free of the presence of a third individual — one who is bound to radiate his or her own psychic characteristics. [...]

[...] We have wondered before about Seth making statements concerning something that might be in the presence of the subject for the test, only to have the subject fail to notice it. [...]

[...] You make certain automatic adjustments in order to perceive what little of my presence that you do perceive. [...]

[...] She gave none; later Jane said she hadn’t the slightest inkling of Seth’s presence as session time passed. [...]

[...] For my part, I’d always felt distinctly uneasy in Marie’s presence on the few occasions we met.

[...] Frank Watts, it will be remembered, was our communicator; the present Seth entity did not announce his presence until the 4th session, when he superseded Frank Watts.

[...] Seth did not announce his presence until the 4th session. [...]

[...] According to Judaism and Christianity, among many religions, man could seek forgiveness and salvation; he had a soul. After Darwin, he learned that even his physical presence on earth was an accident of nature. [...]

(Within such a gloomy framework, then, I think it legitimate to ask how the species can consciously stress its accidental presence in the cosmos, yet demand that its members be the most “moral” of creatures. [...]

[...] That illumination was everywhere then at every point aware of itself, and of the conditions formed by its presence.

[...] She said she had been quite aware, this evening, of the presence of another personality in the room with us. [...]

[...] I didn’t “see” the reasons and actions leading to his presence there, and I doubt if I ever will. [...]

(“Seth, is our cat Willy aware of your presence with us, now? [...]

[...] Jim Beckett stated that midway through the monologue, he felt the presence of Bill Macdonnel so strongly that he expected to see Bill walk in the door. [...]

[...] Just before Seth announced his presence to us in that same session, Frank Withers spelled out a remark through the board that meant little to Jane and me at the time: “One whole entity may need several manifestations, even at simultaneous so-called times.”

[...] She thought this was because of the presence of witnesses. [...]

[...] The first test in the presence of witnesses... [...]

“Value fulfillment is most difficult to describe, for it combines the nature of a loving presence—a presence with the innate knowledge of its own divine complexity—with a creative ability of infinite proportions that seeks to bring to fulfillment even the slightest, most distant portion of its own inverted complexity. [...]

[...] Mrs. Brian had a terrific headache while reading the article; suddenly she thought she felt Seth’s presence. [...]

(Perhaps because of the presence of a witness, Jane began dictating in a somewhat louder and deeper voice than usual, and maintained the voice all evening. [...]