“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] John brought with him confirmation of some of Seth’s predictions given in the 439th session, to Jane’s pleased surprise. [...] John is going to go over the session material, using his recorder, to sum up Seth’s predictions to date re Searle.

[...] The falling of the man from the first triangle was predicted by Seth in the 439th session, on Sept. [...]

[...] They do not react predictably. [...]

[...] In my daily predictions for today, made yesterday, I had noted that Peggy would not make it. The predictions were made at 3 PM, March 15; Seth has something to say about the hour and day later in the session.

[...] In my daily predictions for today, made yesterday, I had noted down that Peggy would not appear this evening. [...]

(The day wasn’t bad — 25 degrees as I headed for room 330 — but a snowstorm was predicted for the afternoon. [...]

[...] He had forgotten consciously about Seth’s data, but as he drove into the firm’s property he was immediately struck by the similarity there with Seth’s predictions. [...]

(Seth was going into the relationship between predictions and probabilities when the session came to an end because of the mentioned interruption. [...]

[...] None of this is to be considered as prediction. [...]

(Jane’s predictions have been very good recently. [...]

[...] This is covered in Jane’s predictions and material received before the session tonight.)

[...] Snow, which had been predicted, began to fall around 2:30; there is a heavier storm south of us. [...]

[...] You will find that there are peaks of relatively high achievement, and as you acquire practice the peaks will not be so separated and results will be more predictable.

[...] As you know, I do not make predictions, yet he has reached a point with his beliefs, and an efficiency with some methods of implementing them, that I foresee a dramatic change for the better.

[...] With this set of beliefs, attitudes and background, their decision to stay was highly predictable.

[...] The waters receded as Ruburt had predicted. [...]

[...] 4. As we discussed those questions before the session, I wondered whether the poor results of her daily predictions concerning the mail might have a similar basis, whether she told herself or not that she wanted such impressions to work out.

[...] This does apply to the predictions and to his attitudes toward the mail—which are highly ambiguous.

A suggestion like: “If you go swimming too soon after lunch, you will drown,” is extremely dangerous, for it predicts behavior of a disastrous nature that would follow almost automatically after the first act is performed. [...]

Rob and I were both practicing with predictions; they took but a few moments daily. We cleared our minds of objective thoughts and wrote down whatever came into our heads, trying to predict the day’s events. [...]

[...] The other experiments included daily predictions and dream recall; and our dream recall work already had shown us the validity of precognitive dreams.

(Since Peggy has now been made aware of Seth’s predictions, Jane and I now wonder what part, if any, suggestion might play in the events that transpire in Washington DC. Is it possible that the recipient of such predictions can influence physical events, either consciously or unconsciously?

(Apropos of Peggy’s Washington trip, Seth gave predictions when asked to during Friday’s unscheduled session. [...]

[...] Seth’s predictions, and Jane’s own data, given at break, were borne out very well. [...] I did meet two such men, and they were together, also as Seth predicted. [...]

[...] Nevertheless, any physical benefits, any predictions that do occur in such sessions, come as a result of initial spiritual and psychic development. [...]

I have explained to your brother the reasons behind the Ferd prediction, and he will explain them to you. [...]

[...] Both of us were surprised by the predictions, hesitant at taking them literally, I suppose; especially the parts about excellent sales, the beginning of a phenomenon, etc. [...]

[...] We saw their newborn daughter, Jacqueline Ann, about whose birth Jane had given Cec some accurate predictions. [...]

(This morning while I was at work, John Bradley stopped by briefly while on a hurried business trip to give Jane some information relating to a prediction of a narcotics scandal that Seth had predicted for Elmira in the 63rd session, of June 17. [...]

(For other narcotics material that has developed since Seth made the prediction, see the notes on page 170.

[...] She also said she’d like to resume giving predictions again.)