“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] We agreed that they represented fears on our parts — that they weren’t literal or precognitive in any sense.)

If we could remove these blind spots and enlarge the focus of our attention, I think that we would become aware of these other events, and that telepathy, precognition, and clairvoyance would be normal, practical methods of obtaining information. [...]

[...] The facts should be clear to any person who has ever experienced a valid precognitive dream, clairvoyant event, or telepathic communication.

Since the publication of my first ESP book, many people have written me to tell me of their own instances of telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, or projection. [...]

I have spoken often of the precognition of cells, but the unspeakably vast world communication at that level is unimaginable—yet it goes on constantly.

If you think the paper will give you tomorrow’s weather, and only an issue of whether or not to carry an umbrella is involved, then you do not feel the same impetus, or a precognitive dream about the weather. [...]

This appendix contains three of Jane Roberts’ (unfinished) essays on different kinds of “prediction” and precognition experience. [...]

Jane discusses “prediction” and precognition in her books: How to Develop Your ESP Power, Adventures in Consciousness, Psychic Politics, and The God of Jane.

([Molly Pearson:] “Should we not believe in precognitive dreams?”)

Many so-called precognitions are something else entirely different. [...]

(Jane was pleased at the correct information she had given; though much of it was precognitive, and will have to await the passage of time in order to be checked out.

[...] Seth discussed several psychic experiences Bill had noted recently, saying they involved telepathy and precognition. [...]

[...] Precognition requires projection, though here as with clairvoyance the projection itself may not be remembered.

[...] Most of it was precognitive, involving Detroit to some extent and a group of men there; although the data was quite clear to Jane, John could offer little help re interpretation.)

[...] These blueprints are biologically valid — that is, they allow the cells precognitive knowledge, upon which present behavior is based. [...]

[...] Except in periods of extreme physical heat however, the temperature changes and the resulting electromagnetic alterations, are easily converted into legitimate impressions of a clairvoyant nature, precognitive information, and so forth.

[...] You spoke in your notes (two days ago) of precognition in connection with art — an excellent point. Precognition in those terms also applies at your birth, when ahead of time you are quite aware on unconscious levels of those conditions that you will meet. [...]

[...] Precognitively you are unconsciously quite aware — again in your terms — of the results of any given action or cause. [...]

[...] Telepathy and precognition could also be factors.

[...] Seth has stated that such terms as telepathy, clairvoyance, precognition, etc., are of but relative usefulness; perhaps this instance is but an example of the ability of part of the mind to dissolve the time barrier.

End of session, with one point: These changes in Ruburt’s body are as magical as any precognitive dream in that regard. [...]

[...] As I came out with that, I got something over here” — she gestured to her right, indicating one of the channels of information available from Seth — “about the unpredictability of consciousness, and precognition and heredity: the cell’s soul and the soul’s cell….”

[...] I’m unwilling to ascribe the “conventional” notions of precognition or retrocognition to such a tenuous relationship between the two sessions. [...]

(This would make the dream precognitive.

Within the patterns of human experience, then, lies evidence of man’s greater ability: He rubs shoulders with his own deeper understanding whenever he remembers, say, a precognitive dream, an out-of-body—whenever he feels the intrusion or infusion of knowledge into his mind from other than physical sources. [...]

[...] Without much thought Jane and I had taken the data given on this instance to refer also to John’s September 2 date, since by coincidence the 84th session also fell due on September 2. This evening John said that he’d had no “disagreement in a kitchen, involving two women and a man, with a child close by,” on September 2. So now we wonder whether the above incident is precognition, with the actual date being blocked by Jane, or whether Jane is just plain in error.)

(Annie G.: “What about precognitive dreams?”)

(12:23.) Those who want to use their unconscious precognition of such an event will take advantage of it — save themselves, and choose not to be involved. [...]