“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] The ordinary person, for example, in the western world cannot relate to a Darwinian past in that same fashion, and psychology robs him of any personal extension in the future after death, so in practical life most modern people have freedom of extension in space but less in time. [...]

[...] It is imperative that Ruburt throw considerable energy into his idea for classes; whether in writing or in psychic matters, that all available, practically available time and effort be given here to such an endeavor; that it not be adopted halfheartedly.

[...] All of you, you see, with two exceptions—these two (Sue and Daniel)—youhave been so caught in organizational realities and daily practicalities that you have leashed your intellects. [...]

Philosophically and practically there are many ramifications on this subject that I hope to cover, but what I have said for now applies. [...]

[...] Some want to HELP THE WORLD AT LARGE — in capital letters — but all they do is think about this desire without trying to implement it at all in practical terms. [...]

[...] When Jane came to the phone, she was informed that insofar as it was possible to verify her earlier data, practically all of it had been correct. [...]

[...] “Pagan” practices, giving far more leeway to sexual identification and expression, continued well into the 16th century, and the so-called occult underground heretical teachings tried to encourage the development of personal intuition.

[...] As far as general practice is concerned, we will deal with our dreams in a much more positive and constructive manner, along the lines of expectation.

[...] Were she to follow it, practically all we eat would be forbidden. [...]

[...] One of these will be out for all practical purposes. [...]

Many concepts, advancements and practical inventions simply wait in abeyance in the world of dreams until some man accepts them as possibilities within his frame of reality. [...]

[...] Basically, even the physical universe itself is so constructed, but for all practical purposes, as far as perception and experience is concerned, time and physical growth apply. [...]

(On more “practical” levels, we thought that behavior among nations might be changed for the better if the idea of counterparts were understood, or at least considered — if, for instance, many of the individuals making up a country realized that they could actually be acting against portions of themselves [or of their whole selves] in the persons of the “enemy” country, and so modified the virulence of their feelings. [...]

[...] I’ll simply add that in religious terms alone Christ can be seen as androgynous, in that he’s obviously a symbol of the unification of opposites — whether of the conscious and the unconscious, the feminine and the masculine, this reality and others, the mystical and the “practical,” and so forth. [...]

[...] He did not understand however that fear is not practical. [...]

It is not the soul, but the soul of the body that you must learn to trust; for the soul in the body represents the corporeal meeting of the physical and nonphysical selves, in the most practical of terms. [...]

[...] In those areas where you are dissatisfied, you are not putting the material to work, for it does work in the most immediate and practical ways.

Shortly the improvements in performance, you see, will give you practical evidence that will in itself accelerate further improvements. [...]

[...] They are drawn to what emotionally arouses them or offers them hope, even though they may only be able to put a small portion to practical use. [...]

[...] He felt that you thought he wanted more than you could give—or wanted to give, practically speaking.

[...] He had to see what both extremes were extremes—not practical or idealistic. [...]

I did not forget the first of my own books, incidentally, but put it off in order that more practical material concerning Ruburt could be given. [...]