“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] If you do entertain such ideas yourself, you must often personify such spirits, projecting upon them your own ideas of personhood. [...]

A great artist in any field or in any time instinctively feels a private personhood that is greater than the particular sexual identity. [...]

[...] You do this by accepting the rightness of your own personhood. [...]

[...] Your personhood exists first, however. [...]

As most of my readers know, I make no claims of now having a physical personhood. [...]

[...] It is like a splendid ship, the body, that you have chosen ahead of time for a splendid challenging adventure—a ship that you have personally appointed that is equipped to serve as much as possible as a physical manifestation of your personhood.

Give us a moment … (Still in trance, Jane lit a cigarette.) Your stratified concepts of one-personhood overlook all such inherent differences, however, and you have a tendency to transpose your own concepts whenever you come in contact with those whose ideas you cannot understand. [...]

[...] The idea of one personhood still closes your eyes to the greater multipersonhood that is your true reality. [...]

[...] Your concepts of personhood are now limiting you personally and en masse, and yet your religions, metaphysics, histories, and even your sciences are hinged upon your ideas of who and what you are. [...]

“Yet I’m sure that Seth stands for something else, a different kind of personhood, and that Seth ‘happens’ when that kind of being intersects with my subjective world.

[...] You are a part of life’s meaning and purpose—but those purposes, “coming from” (long pause), coming from the source of your own being, are too great to be expressed or described within the structure of your personhood as you understand it. [...]