“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] When a person constructs various probable realities in the dream state, he or she does so also in this larger context, in which the probable status of the world is known.

(During our talk I’d cited a long list of things that in my view Jane has given up over the years, at the never-satisfied behest of portions of the personality that were now in complete control. [...]

[...] It translates outer data to the inner personality.

(Roy Fox is a personal friend of ours. [...]

The individual’s ability to receive these impressions of which we have been speaking, and his ability to translate them and to construct them, is all determined by his own personal psychic background in past existences and in the present one, and by his own inner conception of himself, the physical universe, his place in it, and by his inner reactions to ideas.

This in itself is extremely important, and we will deal with it rather extensively in terms of early limitations set by parental attitudes personally and collectively, in terms of individual self-realizations, and in terms of even national accomplishments and racial expectations.

[...] When man realizes that he himself creates his personal and universal environment in concrete terms, then he can begin to create a private and universal environment much superior to the one that is the result of haphazard and unenlightened constructions.

[...] Only after such a basis will the idea of reincarnation achieve its natural validity, and only when it is understood that the subconscious, certain layers of it, is a link between the present personality and past ones, will the theory of reincarnation be accepted as fact.

[...] Personally, I think we have learned little—or have much still to learn. [...]

[...] For the most part, I’m presenting only the beginning of the several pages of notes I took from him—just enough to show how even his more personal material can fly in the face of convention (to coin a phrase!):

Personally, Ruburt understands however that he exaggerated the negative elements of his condition, thinking that he was being realistic. [...]

[...] It will automatically allow the inner portion of his personality to protect him from such probable harm.

It seems evident to you that one person has one mind. [...]

He is not “meant to be” that kind of person.

The fact remains that there are probable past events that “can still happen” within your personal previous experience. [...]

With some individuals some of these dreams may also represent personal symbolisms, but the original dream in the raw, unembellished, is a root dream. [...]

[...] And you are, indeed, off to the right, inner portions of your personality this evening—attending two classes—and you do not have to pay $3 for the other class (to Theodore). [...]

[...] The ensuing guilt is the power that turns such a person into a fanatic. [...]

[...] You would be dealing with the personal subconscious, and there is a tremendous difference. [...]

[...] No physical person will walk that road, however. [...]

[...] In those terms you are one person physically objectified, staring upward in the scene just mentioned at an objectified sky. [...]

[...] It is then aware of your overall psychological climate locally, as it involves you personally, and in world terms.

[...] And there are always fanatics there to stand for ultimate truth, and to lift from the individual the challenge and “burden” of personal achievement and responsibility. [...]