“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Therefore the construction was only seen by the one person to whom the inner clues were given. [...]

There is much more I will say here in another session on personal matters. [...]

[...] If five people were in this room, then they would each construct, in their own personal perspective, their own image of Ruburt, which would be composed of definite, material, atoms and molecules. [...]

There are cleavages, but the best portions of both of your personalities can be most effectively fulfilled if those cleavages are bridged, bypassed. [...]

[...] He was a personality who left you when his own reincarnations were finished. [...]

Do not accept compromises, for you personally cannot live with them for any length of time. [...]

[...] I will let you take a break and return for I have a few personal remarks for you, and not accidental remarks. [...]

[...] You are the person who hunts you down the years and the days. [...]

([Gert:] “Is this a force that I personally feel or our cultural or this physical universe that we have created?”)

[...] It is in this personal area that a basic fear exists also. This is a high simplification, but you feel that your value as a person and as a man in the family situation is determined not only by your ability to provide, but increases in proportion to your financial status.

You have taken it, subconsciously now, as a personal failure that you are not farther ahead, not only financially but in terms of the amount of power you would like to hold. [...]

[...] Now that is true and not true, as you know—for ideally, how marvelous it would be if each person could indeed understand those balances and artistic lacks of balances when they appear.

[...] The brave portions of your personalities went on helping each other, as per the dream, until Pat Norelli, as Ruburt, easily working through belief systems stands center stage, ready to speak to other frightened portions of yourselves still on a high ledge. [...]

The emotional identification with nature meant that man had a far greater and richer personal emotional reality. [...]

[...] He knew his death, his personal death, was only a transition, for his identification allowed him to feel the mobility of his consciousness, and allowed him to feel a sense of communion with the passing seasons, and with the ever-constant renewal of plants and fields. [...]

[...] I also have an attitude that is quite personal, whether it is a good one or not: I don’t care too much what others think about my painting. [...]

He feels highly disloyal facing any of these thoughts, mainly because he does not want to hurt someone he loves so deeply—the only person in fact he loves in the world.

[...] You give to one in your way, and something may be given to you of a different nature by an entirely different person, and yet it is a result of your own giving. [...]

(“I was wondering about confusing the rest of the personality.”)

[...] I have to get into it in a certain deliberate way that I didn’t have to for the others [Seth Speaks and Personal Reality].” Jane snapped her fingers several times. [...]

This is personal material. [...]

There may be, for example, complications arising from a person’s intents, loves, and desires that cause the individual to seek certain events that his or her very beliefs make impossible. [...]

In such instances a dream, or a series of them, will often then alter the person’s beliefs in a way that could not otherwise occur, by providing new information. [...]

[...] As long as one person commits violence for the sake of peace you will have war. [...]

[...] In Personal Reality I stressed many of these points for our readers, but you yourselves forget to apply them in that one important area of your lives. [...]

This involves an assimilation on the part of Ruburt’s whole personality, that is quite important for his overall development. [...]

[...] Seth spoke on the integration of our personalities also in the 228th session; the material grew out of his material on the poetry book Jane produced so effortlessly. [...]

[...] Jane explained that our own experiments call up a chain of personal associations which she must sort out in reciting the data. [...]

The person as yet may have no idea that in contrast to what experience is available, his world, life, is highly limited, or flawed, for the person does not know good furniture from poor.

[...] There are periods of balance, where for example—and I am using analogies, understand me—you may find a product, a person at a certain balance point, pleased with all aspects of life, in good health, well-off financially, and meeting goals. [...]

[...] The person steps out of usual context. [...]

Dictation: We will be discussing alternate methods of orientation that consciousness can take when allied with flesh, trying to give the reader some personal experience with such altered conditions, along with a brief history of some civilizations that utilized these unofficial orientations as their predominant method of focus.

5. “Disentanglement” immediately reminded me of the inner senses — those qualities and abilities which the personality uses to apprehend its physical (or camouflage) world. [...]

[...] I was personally quietly disgusted by the whole affair, and told her I’d cheerfully dispense with whatever was causing the upset, lest it turn into a chronic physical inconvenience. [...]

A Personal Evaluation

[...] As you create and experience your daily life through your personal feelings and beliefs, so the same applies to dream reality.

In the past, Rob’s portraits were representations of personalities involved with us personally through association or past life connections—as far as we know. [...] Later one of my students, George, picked out the painting as a portrait of a personality called Bega, who communicates with him through automatic writing. [...]

[...] The “Januarious” connection doesn’t seem to be related, yet it is highly important because for me personally it had a strong religious connotation: one of my favorite grade-school teachers was a nun, Sister Januarious. [...]

[...] In extrasensory perception—as in so-called normal perception—the natural inclinations of the personality dictate the kind of information that will be sought from any available field of data.

(Pause.) Painting should be enough, you may think sometimes, but you chose to be the kind of person who wanted to explore the greater reaches of reality, from which art itself emerges. [...]

[...] He just looked at me like I was an entirely different person—either that, or I perceived him differently in trance.”