“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] There is general and mass focus of all self-structures within that system, binding enough and cohesive enough so that the appearance of a permanent and all-pervading physical reality is maintained. [...]

[...] Jane’s delivery had slowed considerably.) In somewhat the same way your identity changes constantly, even while you retain your sense of permanence. That sense of permanence rides upon endless changes — it is actually dependent upon those physical, spiritual, and psychic changes. [...]

You think that the bodies that you have are permanent, but it is highly difficult for me to see the specific bodies that you now occupy, since I see you in all your reincarnational involvements and some of them have been highly involved indeed! [...]

[...] While you believe in the system you can find some help in it, but it is temporary, not permanent, and further binds you to a limiting system. [...]

I have mentioned before that in its own way the dream universe is as permanent as the physical universe. [...]

I’ve said that the dream world has its own sort of form and permanence. [...]

Within the reality of the dream world, fulfillment and dependence, then, are not dependent upon permanence in physical terms. [...]

[...] Any appearance of permanence is illusion.

(Long pause at 8:15.) With some people (long pause), such bindings are so secure that in one way or another they provide an overall, fairly permanent inner and outer framework. [...]

[...] Often they are permanent. [...]

[...] For that “condition” is not a permanent thing, but a changing reality, an improving condition.

[...] It is not one continuous thing, although to you it seems permanent enough while it lasts. [...]

[...] They would exist in a permanent kind of environment.

I mentioned that this creation is constant, and while objects appear to have rigidity and permanence, they do not. [...]

[...] Nevertheless, for all the appearance of permanence and rigidity, your chair is only a chair by virtue of your own concept—gestalt, that is in itself severely limited due to the limitations of outer senses. [...]

[...] The smallest atom has its own kind of built-in integrity, upon which all of its organizations and alterations are based, so generally there is a gestalt kind of permanence within the body of the earth.

[...] However the suggestions must be followed for it to be permanent. [...]

[...] Matter was not yet permanent, in your terms, for consciousness was not yet as stable there. [...]

[...] They present a kind of chain of command—one that is not usually permanent for any long period, however.

[...] In any case there seems to be a feeling of permanency with this—something that once undertaken will continue. [...]

[...] But the event provided us with an obvious clue—any body that can undergo so spontaneous a change can hardly be one that’s permanently fixed in a stiffened condition.... [...]

Coupled with our reservations about the uncertain state of the art concerning nuclear power, Jane and I deeply mourn the shameful fact that for some 30 years now our country’s government and industry have neglected to develop safe methods for the transportation and permanent storage of radioactive waste materials; some of these will remain highly toxic for hundreds of thousands of years, and thus pose potential threats to many many generations. [...]