“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] It involves a curious sense of dropping down inwardly, of going slowly beneath the realities we usually perceive…. [...]

[...] A man, literally of flesh and blood, must then prove beyond all doubt that each and every other [human being] survives death — by dying, of course, and then by rising, physically-perceived, into heaven. [...]

[...] The vast social structures of Christianity were instead based upon man’s “sinful” nature — not the organizations and structures that might allow him to become good, or to obtain the goodness that Christ quite clearly perceived man already possessed.

[...] Consider this analogy: Taking it for granted that you are indeed multidimensional, you can perceive only so much of your own experience at a time because of the characteristics of physical creaturehood; the three-dimensional system automatically specializes in before-and-after effects.

[...] You follow a one-line pattern of history, pursuing certain actions as reality and identifying with these so completely that they are all you perceive. [...]

Since the outer senses or their equivalent are the main perceptors of camouflage constructions, then the outer senses and the physical apparatus or its equivalent will habitually perceive its particular system as a closed one.

The outer senses perceive only certain given distinctions within an open, infinite system, and these distinctions therefore become the apparent boundaries of the system. [...]

If you remember that beneath all, each unit of consciousness is aware of the position of each other unit, and that these units form all physical matter, then perhaps you can intuitively follow what I mean, for whatever knowledge man attains, whatever experience any one person accumulates, whatever arts or sciences you produce, all such information is instantly perceived at other levels of activity by each of the other units of consciousness that compose physical reality—whether those units form the shape of a rock, a raindrop, an apple, a cat, a frog or a shoe. [...]

[...] You do not perceive the consciousness of objects. [...]

Still, my experience enriches Seth Two, and his experiences enrich me to the extent that I am able to perceive and translate them for my own use. [...]

[...] When you think of the soul as a closed system you perceive it as such, and close off from yourself the knowledge of its greater creativity and characteristics.

(Pause.) Because you are people, you personify what you perceive — “peopleize” it. [...] Instead there are simply species of consciousness, entirely different from your own, not usually perceived physically under most conditions. [...]

(Jane pointed to Joanie.) Our friend here should stay away from lettuce… (I asked why.) There is oversimulation, reacting upon her system… that does not enable her to correctly perceive the nature of her own experiences… Too much stimulation without understanding.

[...] In so doing you not only help yourself but others as well, for they perceive your safety, and look for the reasons. [...]

In the first form, it is possible to perceive the past, present or future on a limited basis. [...]

[...] In it, it is possible to travel beyond your solar system, and to perceive the past, present and futures of other systems as well as your own. [...]

[...] Here you will begin to perceive quite clearly constructions that are not your own, where earlier these are but dimly glimpsed. [...]

[...] They exist in another dimension, but as a rule you cannot perceive it. [...]

The psychological composition of the perceiving participator is therefore entirely alien to your own. In such a system however, as in your own, the perceiver is also a participator and a creator, but he does not work with your conception of time, but with probabilities. [...]

Such an event will however occur within another time system, for all probabilities become actual, although you may not perceive them. [...]

The whole psychological formation of the perceiver is entirely different, and there is no one event out of all probable events, but there is experience of all the mathematically probable events that could happen to any given individual, within any given amount of time as you know it.

The physical structure alone is simply not divided from other structures in the manner which you perceive it to be through use of the outer senses. [...]

This arbitrary limitation set upon the individual self is put upon it by its reliance upon the outer senses, as a method of perceiving reality. [...]

[...] There is no reason to feel that man is insignificant, or that the individual is impotent or at the mercy of forces he can neither perceive nor comprehend. [...]

There is a temporary and initial, barely perceivable enlargement, a deep pulsing in the manner of a beating forth of cells and molecules—actually a sort of pulsation resulting in a minute but definite enlargement of tissue. [...]

The behavior of electrons, for example, will elude your technological knowledge — for in deepest terms what you will “perceive” will be a facade, an appearance or illusion. [...]

[...] Until you perceive the innate consciousness behind any “visible” or “invisible” manifestations, then, you put a definite barrier to your own knowledge.

[...] Electrons, however, spin in many directions at once,⁶ an effect impossible for you to perceive. [...]

[...] Everything that is, is, whether or not you can perceive it. You are equipped however to perceive far more than you do, through use of the inner senses.

[...] It is the probable God-drama that you choose to perceive. There were others that were perceived, but not by you, and there are other such dramas existing now.

[...] They serve to shape mental events as you physically perceive them.

[...] As a result he does not understand the greater natural mobility he himself possesses, nor can he practically perceive the natural psychological gestalts of which he is a part, that form all of your natural — meaning physical — world.

When his senses, his outer senses, do not perceive a physical object in his self-perspective (and hyphenate that please), in his self-perspective, the object simply does not exist. If the object is touched and not seen or otherwise perceived, then in his self-perspective it exists only in the realm of his sensual perception of it. [...]

Your senses do not perceive this. [...]

[...] Your egotism, imagining that what you cannot perceive must therefore be either dead or nonexistent, does not even trouble me.

[...] You must realize that within this room, and within any room, at any time there are other personalities that you do not perceive. There are ways of perceiving them if they choose to be perceived. [...]

[...] It has come so far into physical reality (Sue is eight months pregnant), that it can perceive telepathically, but it will be some time, as you know, before it will be able to interpret speech as such. [...]

[...] The entity can perceive the room in which you sit as if your belly were a window, but it sees with inner sight, and forms the images through the inner senses.

[...] It then mentally perceives the room, right now, more or less as a combination of those ideas you have individually of it. [...]

(Pause.) Now in medieval times organized religion, or organized Christianity, presented each individual with a screen of beliefs through which the personal self was perceived. Portions of the self that were not perceivable through that screen were almost invisible to the private person. [...]

[...] Experience is accepted and perceived only as it is sieved through that screen. [...]

[...] They respond to its rich nuances in ways impossible to describe, so that their “civilizations” are built up through the interweavings of sense data that you cannot possibly perceive.