“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(See the tracings of the object on page 309. [...]

[...] See the tracings on page 309. [...]

[...] See the tracings on page 309. [...]

(“Connection with a letter or note,” See the tracings on page 309. [...]

(See the copy on page 197. [...] It is typewritten in black ink on paper the weight of this page, and white. [...]

(See pages 187-89 of the 220th session for the advice Seth refers to.)

(See the tracing of the test object on page 197.

[...] Three men and one woman were present in the studio when the pictures shown on page 198 were taken, for the correct total of four people: Jane, myself, my father and my brother Loren.

[...] It was more offset toward the upper right corner, hence her postmark reference on page 321 also. On page 314 note that my tracing-paper drawing is folded roughly like a card.

[...] See page 269 of the 232nd session for background material and other references. [...]

[...] See the tracings on pages 313-14. [...]

[...] We noted that most of the typed pages of her script bore handwritten comments in the margins and on the back. [...]

(See the notes on page 269, Volume 5, of the 232nd session, dealing with Jane’s recent poetry book and the request by Jane’s publisher, F. Fell, that she send it to him along with a tape of some of the poems, also by Jane. [...] See the notes on page 312, Volume 5. Seth hasn’t named any specific publishers in his predictions, nor have we asked.

[...] See the tracing of the object on page 29. The top and bottom edges of the object are serrated or perforated; several receipts are contained on one page in the book at the post office, and are torn off as used. [...]

[...] See the tracing on page 29. [...]

[...] See Volume 5, page 287.

[...] See the data and our interpretation on page 109, with the description of the two near-circular sculptures in the same window of Bill Macdonnel’s gallery, with the disputed nude painting. Seth gave the above data when I asked him to clarify his original data on page 108. [...]

[...] See the copy of the object on page 104. [...]

[...] On the partial copy attached to page 104 I penned in the row of numbers representing the date after the session. [...]

[...] See the copy of the envelope object on page 104.

[...] See the five and gathering data on page 289, concerning my brother Dick and his family. The next two questions also develop this particular data begun on page 289. [...]

(See the tracing of the object and the notes on page 284. [...]

[...] See page 276 of the 273rd session. [...]

[...] See the tracing on page 3205.

(See the tracing on page 270 and the notes on page 271. [...]

[...] In this respect see page 274, where Seth mentions Jane’s associations.

[...] Again, see Seth’s comments on page 274, concerning his use of Jane’s associations. [...]

[...] Note the mention of music also in the data on pages 274 and 276. [...]

(See the tracing of the envelope object on page 278. As stated, the object is the front page of the announcement of the marriage of my brother Loren’s daughter, Linda, to Dennis Murray of Brooklyn, NY. [...]

[...] I trimmed down the front page of the wedding announcement of my niece, placed it between two pieces of Bristol and sealed it in the usual double envelope. [...]

[...] See page 254. [...]

[...] Page 98. [...]

[...] Jane believed it was an extension of the arrangement Seth mentioned briefly on page 124, when he talked about Jane accepting inspiration and ideas from Ruburt without realizing it.

(See page 113 of the 443rd session for October 21, 1968. [...]

[...] See the 442nd session, page 107, October 14, 1968. [...]

(See pages 111-12 of the 442nd session for Oct. [...]

[...] See the tracing on page 107. [...] See the notes on this on page 102. [...]

[...] See the notes on page 57, preceding the 206th session. [...]

(A somewhat similar question arises concerning a dream Jane had on November 30th, and a few lines of the data given for the 22nd Dr. Instream test; see the following lines on page 104 of the 213th session: “He received a book by mail today, a biography sort of book, having to do with a personality of the late 1800’s. A medium.” [...]

[...] See page 108: Three other impressions checked out.

[...] See the notes on page 248; and the 100th and 101st sessions in Volume 3, for example.

(This reminds me that on page 58 of the 206th session, Seth briefly described what he usually “sees” of us, or any witnesses, during a session. [...]

(See the tracing of the envelope object on page 289. [...]

[...] In this letter Jane discussed the 200 pages she has finished on her first book on the Seth material itself. [...]

[...] See the tracing on page 206, and the notes on page 207.

[...] The above data is a good description of the yellowish brown grass in back of the cat’s head, as explained under the yellow and green data on page 212; and of the way the yellow grass merges into the darker green brown grass around the edges of the photo. See the tracing on page 206.

[...] Don took the picture of the ceramic cat as it sat on a brick wall cutting across grass as indicated in the tracing on page 206. [...]

(“The impression of the four again”, refers we believe to the first impression, interpreted on page 212, and involves the April 4, 1966 date on back of the object.

[...] During break I wrote three-quarters of a page “from” Nebene. [...]

[...] Without getting up from the couch, I wrote another half page of Nebene material. [...]

[...] I’d stopped at the post office to mail Tam the set of page proofs for Seven that Bill O’Hearn had sent us, along with a copy of Bill’s letter re bound copies of page proofs for Seven. [...]

[...] At times she sees the typed page much darker than usual—a good sign of improvement, the potential there. [...]

(For the test this evening I chose a page from my notepad. [...] See the tracing on page 322. The page is on white paper, and the writing on the tracing is done with the same pen I used to make the original notes. I sealed the folded page in the usual double envelopes, also inserting two pieces of Bristol board for stiffeners. [...]

[...] See pages 316-321.

Off and on been doing Stonehenge poem—type up 6 new pages of it today.... [...]

[...] I sent Psyche to Tam Mossman at Prentice-Hall on the 22nd, and on the same day we received from him the page proofs for Seven Two. [...]

[...] Those “notes,” however, dealing with other matters, ran for several more pages before Seth said good night at 10:38 P.M.

[...] See page 35 for material and notes concerning the present status of this question of sepia and Van Elver.)

(Again, see page 35.)

(See page 5, the 422nd session of July 10, 1968. [...]

[...] (See page 185. [...]

[...] See page 186.)

[...] The first goes after the word mother on page 184 as marked after the word mother, as follows:)

(“What do you think of my sculp?” See page 189)

[...] See pages 102, 107 and 114 in this volume. [...]

(See page 92 in Session 100.)

[...] See Volume 2, page 65. [...]

[...] This particular instance is on page 116.