“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Your consciousness is far divorced from the physical organism, and it would be dangerous to stay away for any extended period of physical time. [...]

[...] However many of the fragmentary apparitions that he has seen, for he has actually seen more fragmentary apparitions than he realizes, many of these have been fragmentary through his own inability to organize the material from the inner senses.

[...] Physical expression is again the result of the personality’s characteristic method of manipulating the physical organism. [...]

[...] It would take a considerable organization of trained investigators, and much time, to thoroughly study the results of such projections of energy. [...]

Think about it: Some of us are born brilliant and some mad, some with bodies swift and elegant, others missing vital organs or whole limbs. [...]

[...] I could feel the organs inside me grow. [...]

Both involve culminations formed by various levels of the self, and yet are impressed into the physical organism. [...]

[...] The hope is that our hiatus as far as encountering the public goes will give us some valuable time to organize new approaches to our lives.

[...] He was also described as organizing a pilgrimage to commemorate the fiftieth anniversary celebrations at Fatima, which is only ten miles from the seminary. [...]

[...] The third eye (sometimes called the “back eye”) is the legendary organ of psychic perception, supposedly located behind the forehead. [...]

[...] Dream experiences, long forgotten consciously, are forever contained as electrically coded data within the cells of the physical organism. [...]

In more specific terms, I’m organizing this rather short exploration of Jane’s death around these items; a loose chronology surrounding her writing of Seth, Dreams … in 1966-67, and our unsuccessful attempts to sell the book; my acceptance of the survival of the personality after physical death; a waking experience involving my sensing Jane very soon after she had died; a metaphor I created for her death; a dream in which I not only contacted her but gave myself relevant information; another metaphor for Jane’s death; my speculations about communication among entities, whether they’re physical or nonphysical; a letter that could be from the discarnate Jane — one that was sent to me by its recipient, a caring correspondent whom I’ll call Valerie Wood; a note I wrote to Sue Watkins about the death of her mother; some quotations from a published letter of mine; Jane’s notes concerning the relationship we had; and, finally, the poem in which she refers to her nonphysical journeys to come.

[...] For example, in one past life you attacked quite forcibly the female physical organs: an ovary with which you had great difficulty.

[...] These haven’t been like the typical experience, wherein she’d feel her psyche rising out of a physical organism that was securely anchored by gravity to her chair to the floor, for example. [...]

[...] She has been, and is, a great help in organizing that mass of material, coordinating and computerizing it for researchers in a number of interesting ways that Jane and I hadn’t thought of doing “way back when” my wife was delivering the sessions. [...]

[...] At the Inn in 1997 and 1999 Laurel and I had been guests at well-attended Seth conferences organized by Lynda Dahl and Stan Ulkowski. [...]