“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(This supported Seth in my opinion.

[...] The same was true for many scientists and theistic thinkers in succeeding generations, and in my opinion this holds today. [...]

[...] Yet in the next paragraph I added that in my opinion, “Seth’s concept of simultaneous time will always elude us to some extent as long as we’re physical creatures….” [...]

[...] (My personal opinion is that although many may think it difficult reading, Appendix 4 contains some of the most important information in Volume 1.)

[...] In accidental ways that would be quite humorous if they weren’t so personal, we’ve also learned what negative ideas others can have about us: A person will inadvertently reveal to us, during a conversation, or in a letter or over the telephone, the unflattering opinions his or her mate, or parents, or friends, really have of Jane and me and the work we’re engaged in with the Seth material.

(Seth’s statements on page 207, to the effect that even incorrect test data is legitimate to important layers of the personality, is probably an important one in our opinion. [...]

[...] Once again I note that in my opinion Jane’s dependency represents, at least in part, a search for a “redemption” that encompasses other motivations and realities than those concerned with “just” our temporal lives; that indeed, her impaired state grew out of her mystical nature itself (but was hardly caused by it!).

[...] That’s really what Seth’s work is all about, in my opinion. [...]

[...] But in our opinions a lot of what Seth had to say was pretty personal — so much so that only certain parts of it are given below, along with a few bracketed changes I’ve made to help tie it together. [...]

2. I’ve directed the reader to them before — but in Volume 1 of “Unknown” Reality see Jane’s information on neurological speeds in appendixes 4 and 5. As I wrote in Note 19 for Appendix 12: “My personal opinion is that although many may find it difficult reading, Appendix 4 contains some of the most important material in Volume 1.” [...]

[...] In the meantime she worries, Seth said, about my opinion of her because the money is slow in coming. [...]

Dr. Barnard was kind enough to write a letter to the publishers of this present book, giving his opinions and mentioning that session (Number 303). [...]

[...] You may not have thought of the question consciously, but each of us has an opinion and we guide our daily actions by it whether we realize it or not. [...]

(I am also of the opinion that the three pieces of data just preceding this: A border; blacks that speak loudly; and vivid verticals; might be said to apply to the artwork as much as to the envelope object itself. [...]

[...] I think they’re both well worth having on record, since Jane’s experience was a profound one — and, in my opinion, very revealing for what it tells us about how we ordinarily view our mundane physical reality, and about the much more powerful versions, or “models,” for that reality that exist behind it.

The demand for greater, and if you will permit a personal opinion, sometimes needless attention to detail, he also construes as a hampering or further restriction, added upon the personal supervision that he is now under.

[...] In addition, the AAA office was below ground level and without windows, and my personal opinion was that the music was some kind of compensation for not being able to see daylight.

(The test object is “Paper with printing,” the printing being the machine-applied cancellation, in my opinion, rather than my mother’s handwriting. [...]

(Tests resulting from this upset led to the medical opinion that Bill has two ulcers. [...]

[...] It’s my personal opinion, at least of the moment, that it will be quite a while before Dreams is either finished or printed. [...]

I can’t note the same for The Magical Approach to Reality: A Seth Book—the very promising work that Jane and I first discussed a year and a half ago [in August 1980], after Seth had started his group of excellent private sessions on that subject.⁸ I watched Jane try to write the book a number of times; last month, in Note 6 for Session 939 [in this chapter], I finally expressed the opinion that she wouldn’t finish the job. [...]

[...] If it is a poor one, recognize it as only the opinion you have held of yourself and not as an absolute state.”

[...] In my opinion, she offers a most important insight here toward understanding the formation of our mundane physical reality. [...]