“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

Red globular objects there, and another language. [...]

(On a few occasions in the past we have had instances where Seth insisted a certain sight, or object, was there for the seeing, at a location visited by one of our friends taking part in an experiment; the friend however, with no memory of whatever Seth happened to be talking about, simply could not verify Seth.)

It is now important that he relearn the objective nature of your reality, the simple sanity of an apple as an apple. After this then perhaps he can begin to wonder at the reality behind the objective universe. [...]

[...] You cannot exactly say that each object is a symbol of a belief that specifically, and yet any alterations that you willfully make in your behavior with the objects of your intimate environment represent alterations of beliefs. [...]

[...] He is aware of light and shadow, of shape and form, though he must learn to distinguish those portions of the available field of reality that you accept as objects, from the available field that you do not accept as objects. [...]

[...] Now in your particular case the information can be perceived at such instances through focusing upon the physical object closest to you and then nonfocusing. [...]

[...] You may for example see in the past, present and future, objects that in your time will take up any given space. Often such a dream will be considered meaningless because at your “fact level,” past, present and future objects cannot appear at once in the same space.

[...] It did little good in the past for Freudian psychologists to listen to a person’s associations (pause) while maintaining an objective air, or pretending that values did not exist. [...]

I sit in a swivel chair
with smooth ball bearings.
Without warning, I turn myself
around in a complete circle,
but nothing disturbs
my world vision,
and objects appear on all sides
with sweet precision,
as if a projector in my head
sends out invisible rays that turn
into images, so I
always seem inside
dimensions of depth
and weight.

Ruburt and you can practice by touching various objects, getting the feel of them, so that you can recognize their psychic makeup, and feel it as strongly as you feel the physical composition. [...]

To move an object in one universe, in one field of reality, from another field of reality, is hardly child’s play. [...]

While Seth dictated this book, devoted to the potentials of the psyche and its reception of inner information, my own experiences — as usual — seemed to serve as object lessons backing up his thesis. [...]

[...] According to Seth, it is from this interior body of knowledge that our systemized, objective, information-storing social processes emerge.

[...] Some so-called objective painters, however, use the form to quite imprison the spirit within it. [...]

[...] The units meet with, and to some extent merge with, other units sent out, say, from foliage and all other objects. [...]

To a medical man all of this will seem like the sheerest heresy, because disease will always be seen as an objective thing in the body, to be objectively treated and removed. [...]

There is a certain knack necessary on Ruburt’s part, a difference in the way in which energy is used, a variation of method between sessions in which rather objective material is presented, and in those sessions where we attempt to make a more personal type of contact.

The guests of the other evening were most advantageous, their attitudes objective; not gullible people, nor on the other hand were they the type who will not admit the results of their own experience. [...]

[...] The test object is simply a drawing in black ink of the same symbol used in the first envelope test, of August 18,1965, in the 179th session. [...]

[...] The test object is paper, and is connected with me since my name is on it, and I made the drawing. [...]

The object has something to do with a desk top. [...]

[...] Also a small round object on the desk, I believe of glass, the shape of a globe, and it is heavier than it looks. [...]

[...] He believes he should be objectively intellectual, cool and calm, and spontaneous at the same time. [...]

Your intellect operates beautifully in the notes and appendixes of “Unknown,” but instead of rejoicing in it, you wonder if your notes lack the very kind of emotionalism that would make that particular kind of clear intellectual objectivity most difficult. [...]

[...] You simply perceive the objects that come from the symbols. [...]

[...] Besides the person of whom you are aware, there are also other guises taken by the same personality, and he has appeared in your dreams before you were aware of him objectively. [...]

[...] Standing in the middle of our living room and looking at various objects, such as a vase, a painting on the wall, a plant, etc., I had attempted to let my mind’s eye travel around these objects so that I could picture within the far side of them.

[...] Remember in your painting the relationship of one object to another, not in terms of space necessarily, the interrelationship of the vitality that forms the objects; the vibrating always changing reality within, say, the skin of the apple or the orange, the quite living consciousness within the molecules that make up what seems to be the solid surface of the fruits’ skin.

[...] I hold a small heavy object suspended by a thread so that it’s free to move. [...]