“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Months ago he would not have allowed me to speak until he had a return of symptoms. [...]

For you (pointing to me) always there has been a love of land, and the fruits of the land.

He also to some degree was angry at me, as a male. He partially identified some of my traits with some of yours, so if he was mad at you for telling him, literally to his way of thinking, to hurt himself five times a day by getting up and down from the floor, he was twice as mad at me.

Ruburt sensed this feeling, and it was often in reaction against it that we did not have our next private session, and hence the buried connection: “If you do not love me I will not have a session for you.” [...]

[...] She told me of a dream she’d had last night, vivid, involving her walking, putting on new clothes while in the middle of a street, of leaving the hospital and going across a street into a Five and Ten, of putting pretty decorations in her hair. [...]

(“It’s me,” Jane said.

[...] He knows of me, he is not aware of all the levels of his own identity or personality. [...]

[...] I encouraged her to keep it up even if she was alone, and if she called tonight, to give me a progress report. [...]

Other material given by me was quite correct at the time as those beliefs were applied in the past to various levels of your lives, and as you each interacted. [...]

[...] That week for me had been hectic in that more than usual I was getting telephone calls.... [...]

[...] It’s enough to say here that it wasn’t until after these sessions began, in 1963, that I realized my inner models were quite as valid as those who physically sat before me. Indeed, I often saw the former with a clearer vision, but my early training and work as a commercial artist, beginning in New York City in 1939, conditioned me to believe that the artist was supposed to deal only with what he could “see” objectively.

[...] Jane wants me to add here that she has had many improvements today, in the eyes as well as other parts of the body. [...]

(She told me it was hard to describe, but she has a different sensation of weight in her body, as though she’s relating better to the floor. [...]

(At 10:09 Jane took the envelope for the 80th experiment from me. [...]

(“Can you give me a date connected with the object?”)

(1st Question: Can you give me a date connected with the object? [...]

[...] This led me to read her my notes on Seth’s delivery from 11:25 to 11:47, concerning beliefs in relation to body weight. [...]

If it is somewhat bothersome to me, it is of great benefit to growing things however, and quickens the chemical responses of plant life. [...]

(Jane told me she’d had to have a new catheter inserted at 3:30 a.m. That part went okay, though she was quite uncomfortable by the time I got to 330 — generally uncomfortable, that is. [...]

[...] She had other good news—but first, she told me that last night she’d really been blue for a time. [...]

I want you (speaking to me) to purposely liberate more of your own exuberance. [...]

2. The “officially accepted life” mentioned here reminded me that in the last (694th) session Seth used the phrase “your officially recognized idea of physical reality” in discussing the role probable events played in our world history. [...]

[...] I think I am — if you will forgive me — in my own way more earthy than those other gentlemen.

2. “Rob wanted me to do a paragraph or so about my reactions to the book on scientific creationism that I’ve just finished reading,” Jane wrote, “so here goes. [...]

[...] So Seth’s version of All That Is being both within and without the universe makes more sense to me, and I’m very curious about where he’ll go with this in his book. [...]

[...] However, break didn’t last long enough for me to even lay down my pen. Seth launched into a few paragraphs of material for Jane and me, then ended the session at 11:05 P.M.