“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(The child was male as given in the session. The month of February was mentioned; and in February she signed the papers putting the child up for adoption. “Turnabout with the child, a complete change of plan or a turnabout” refers to the fact that she wanted to keep the baby but its father refused to marry her and pushed her into having it adopted; she was a minor also at the time. 1947 is mentioned, the year she met the child’s father; the age 17 is mentioned; she was 17 when she met him: a school connection mentioned and she was still in school at the time.

(Toward the end of the session, I was in an emotional turmoil, still in trance and for this Barb told me at the time she had no explanation. I thought I was in a hospital room. Most likely this was my interpretation of her giving birth to the child; she was supposed to have a Caesarean section but didn’t and was in labor 25 hours; a woman is described here, gray hair, buck teeth, yellow teeth—this, Barb says, is a description of the man’s mother—she wanted him to marry Barb: teeth not really buck but protuberant and yellowed; also gray hair. she does not remember the room number at the hospital or the color of the walls [given as green].)

(“Were you married?”)

(“Is Doris married?”)

(“What is Doris’s married name?”)

[...] I plan to be married in September. [...] My friend as referred to in the session is the one I plan to marry in September. [...]

[...] She was married at 18. [...]

(They were married 28 years, and had a son and a daughter. [...]

[...] Malba’s parents were not married and the aunt brought Malba and her brother up. [...]

PM—couple just married drop in.

[...] To have a child might help fulfill the man she was married to, but this could destroy the artist she was married to. [...]

[...] Ruburt married an artist first and a male secondly. You married a poet first and a female secondly. [...]

Jane and I had been married for three months when my father photographed her in March 1955.

Delmer and Marie Roberts married in March 1928. [...]

(“Why did Jane’s parents marry?”)

(“Why did my father marry my mother?”)

[...] Neither Ann or Leonard married. You married, but not at the usual age—later. [...]

In any case, in the context of this discussion, had you not married Ruburt, you would have remained single, or possibly married to a woman who also would not want children. [...]

[...] I went through Pratt with him, and Jane met he and his wife once after we were married and were still living in the NY metropolitan area. [...]

(“An entrance,” Linda, a Protestant, married a Catholic in a Brooklyn church. Jane said she felt the reference to an entrance concerned the recent decision by the Ecumenical Council in Rome, to the effect that Protestants could now be allowed to enter the altar enclosure to be married. My brother Loren told us Sunday that this decision is so recent that his daughter was the first to be married in such a fashion in this church.

[...] Linda did want to get married, of course.

[...] The connection is far-out: My brother, father of the Protestant bride who married a Catholic, was at my parents’ home Sunday; the people who live next door are Catholic.

In another system of reality your father was — in fact, still is — a well-known inventor, who never married but used his mechanically creative abilities to the fullest while avoiding emotional commitment. [...] They were going to be married — and in terms of years, the same years are involved, historically. At one time, then, in your father’s past as you think of it, having met Stella, he did not marry her after all. [...]

[...] In that other probability in which your parents originally met, your mother married a doctor, became a nurse, and helped her husband in his practice. [...]

(Just before she took a nap this noon, Jane received a letter from a man who explained that he’d married a woman with genetic deformities of her hands. [...] The writer has obviously learned much from reading the Seth material, and revealed insight as to why he and his lady had chosen to marry to begin with. [...]

[...] The tailor may be dancing or dying or getting married. Later, in waking life, you may discover that a friend of yours, a Mr. Taylor (spelled), has a party, or dies, or gets married, whatever the case may be; yet you might never connect the dream with the later event because you did not understand the way that words and images can be united in your dreams.

[...] [They had just been married:])

[...] And with your intellect and with your reason, and even I, as bothmale and female, have been married without ceremony and with ceremony and the true marriage has nothing to do with ceremony of that kind. [...]

(Billie was the third wife of Jerry’s father, and she herself had been married once before. [...]

[...] (Married 1st time.)

(Billie was the third wife of Jerry’s father, and she had been married once before herself. [...]

(“Did your son Ted ever marry?”)

(“Can you tell us the year Ted was married?”)

(“Well, then can you approximate the time when Ted was married, say within 5 years?”)

[...] As I mentioned earlier, she did marry a cavalry officer, and bore him many children.

[...] Since her parents had not married her off, and as she was somewhat of a strain on the family income, Throckmorton gave her a cash settlement. [...]

[...] She never married and did not live to see womanhood. [...]

[...] A mate from any given life, for example, may or may not represent someone with whom you have a deep abiding tie, and again you may marry someone because of highly ambiguous feelings from a past life, and choose a married relationship that is not based upon love, though love may emerge.