“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

A man or woman who knows hate also understands the difference between that emotion and love. [...]

“The book was based on the idea that nature was against man; and that religion was man’s attempt to operate within that unsafe context. [...] The idea of the stories was to save each man from having to encounter reality in such a frightening fashion…. [...]

A fourth entry had been made at Three Mile Island in November, and a fifth, with a 14-man crew, was projected for December 11. [...]

[...] Jane’s material from her sinful self is obviously too long and complicated to present here, but I stress that one of its main concerns is its genuine and ironic puzzlement as to why man has for so long—probably from even before he started recording his history—persisted in the creation of and reliance upon entities like the sinful self! [...]

[...] Once I think the title of a children’s tale appeared in the air in large block letters, the idea also being that outside of the known order provided by these stories, there were raging forces working against man’s existence. [...]

(“Who is the other man mentioned besides myself?”

(“Do you want to go back to that other man now?”)

(3rd Question: Who is the other man mentioned besides myself? [...]

(5th Question: Do you want to go back to that other man now? [...]

Originally, psychological time allowed man to live in the inner and outer worlds with relative ease … and man felt much closer to his environment. [...]

It was invented by the ego to protect the ego, because of the mistaken conception of dual existence; that is, because man felt that a predictable, conscious self did the thinking and manipulating, and an unpredictable self did the breathing and dreaming. [...]

[...] She has been both a man and a woman, and the entire identity who has lived these separate lives can be designated by the name of Ruburt.

I am primarily a teacher, but I have not been a man of letters per se. [...]

Man is himself a particular system or unit of action within other systems of action, and he is himself composed of other units of action. [...]

[...] This will be the basis for our next session, for you will see how dreams also serve as the other face, so that man himself stands at a threshold that is also a barrier, or stands at a barrier that is also a threshold.

[...] When you fear that man will most certainly destroy himself through his misuse of technologies, then you are expressing the same feeling in different form expressed by the religious attitude—only religion’s devils are turned into technological devices. [...]

The creative abilities must revolve largely about man’s definition of himself, his source and purpose, and all of your Western literature and art has revolved about the concept of the Sinful Self in one way or another. [...]

[...] A man in a dark suit stands up. [...]

[...] It is connected with a general, but I believe the man whose image is represented by the statue stabbed the general. [...]

Man has been endowed, and has endowed himself, with a conscious mind to direct the nature, shape and form of his creations. [...]

[...] The world as the race of man knows it is the materialization en masse of your individual expectations. [...]

[...] He believed in an idealized good, while believing most firmly and simultaneously that man was fatally flawed (loudly), filled with evil, more naturally given to bad rather than good intent. [...]

He was as paranoid as any poor deluded man or woman is who feels, without evidence, that he or she is being pursued by creatures from space, earthly or terrestrial enemies, or evil psychic powers. [...]

(“Why were animals here on earth for so long before man?”)

[...] (Pause.) The man who receives it will understand it. A man to whom he shows it will not. [...]

Give us a moment … While connected with your own civilization, the man Einstein¹ came closest perhaps in this regard, for he was able to quite naturally identify himself with various “functions” of the universe. [...]

[...] So, often, you attempt to examine the nature of the brain in man by destroying the brains of animals, by separating portions of the animal brain from its components, isolating them, and tampering with the overall integrity of both the animal in question and of your own spiritual processes. [...]

He discusses in depth the experience of early man and the different organizations of perception that prevailed, and stresses that the species has always had access to “inner data” so that its source of knowledge was never exclusively dependent upon exterior circumstances. [...]

[...] He sees the psyche experimenting privately with probable actions in the dream state, and envisions humanity’s mass dreams as providing an inner vehicle by which man chooses global events. [...]

The other man seems to have a connection with three women in particular. [...]

The other man may have papers in a briefcase, in which Dr. Instream is interested.

[...] A newspaper man, a colleague of hers, told Peg that, though he didn’t know me at all, he awakened in the middle of the night convinced that I was in his room. [...] The man has no interest in psychic matters, and told Peg because he knew she was a friend of mine. [...]

A frog sat still and stared with awe
At a watch that lay in the sand.
“Now,” he thought, “I am quite sure
There is such a thing as Man.”

“Our priests,” he mused, “have spoken
of Man Who made our pond.
Perhaps He left this as a token,
Between us, to be a bond.”

A strained relationship between himself and another, a man. [...]

[...] Roy is a man in his sixties, had never married, and since he seemed so completely happy in this situation we had assumed marriage would follow. [...]

[...] She states that the material at the beginning of the Dr. Instream test data, on page 113, applies to a cocktail party she attended in Washington on Monday, December 6. Peggy states Seth’s description here of the cocktail party is quite correct, even to the fact that a woman was the main hostess, and that a man, her husband, was present with her. [...]

[...] (Pause.) It is from a man but there is also a connection with a woman. [...]

The fifty-six did refer to the man’s age.

The unknown element did refer to the man’s imminent death, that was not known of course at that time.

[...] A man here.

[...] A man here.” [...]

(This data is a little more specific than that on page 23, and the man reference concerns Dick; as stated Dick and Barbara visited a certain local pub, and an altercation developed between them because of this. [...]

[...] He did not reinforce the director’s sense of his own importance, and the man was used to that. Nor did he speak in the honeyed spiritual tones that the man expected from the psychics he dealt with.

[...] A man protects his family because he loves it—but in his love he can see threats all around.