“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] High activity connected with a male, or repressed violent tendencies, in the situation.” [...] A male teacher entered with a young male student in tow, and literally threw the student across the classroom in a violent fit of anger. [...]

[...] High activity connected with a male, of repressed violent tendencies, in the situation.

[...] Perhaps two males in particular and a female. [...]

[...] Perhaps two males in particular and a female. [...]

The character of Christ as it is portrayed is an excellent one, since it stressed human rather than specifically male qualities. Or should I say it stressed human qualities rather than those unfortunately considered male qualities. [...]

[...] A connection with another individual, a male.

[...] Jane’s father, who addressed the envelope, can be “A connection with another individual, a male.” [...]

John Wayne represented old lines of conventionalized beliefs about the male. Wayne represented feelings about the male that you received in your background from your father, and through boyhood movies, in which the male could afford affectionate behavior or conversation—only with his horse (with amusement). In other words, the uncommunicative male, who was afraid of open sentiment. [...]

[...] Your salvation lies in giving up personal male love and marriage as (underlined) a condition for existence. Because you do often misinterpret me, I repeat: this does not mean you will not find such a male and relationship. [...]

[...] You are indeed obsessed with the idea of marriage, and with male love, but as Joseph mentioned this is but a symptom.

You set yourself against all of this, against the gist of life and joy and vitality, and turn your back upon it with the paltry excuse: “If one person does not love me in a male-female relationship in this life, then I threaten to destroy myself, and shatter the form that holds the spirit, and shatter the form like a glass thrown upon the floor, like a child in a tantrum.” [...]

[...] Practically speaking, you must stop insisting upon male-female personal love as the condition of existence. [...]

(“Is Catherine a male or female cat?”

[...] Male or female, the cat is now called Catherine, and answers to it. [...]

[...] Seth didn’t say so but she received from him the definite feeling that Catherine is a male. [...]

[...] It goes without saying that the framework is male-oriented —but even then the male is really no adequate male unless he becomes a warrior, and pushes himself to perform against the powers of darkness, on the one hand, and against sloth on the other. [...]

The name Francis, male or female.

[...] Two children and one a male. [...]

[...] Leaving room to fill in information here)The name Francis, male or female. 

[...] Two children and one a male. [...]

[...] Jane told me later that she felt the new influence mentioned would be a male.)

[...] There is here however a fairly strong possibility (underlined), in connection with someone else she may meet—a male who wears glasses in his leisure hours. [...]

(Several times recently Seth has told us we are going to get ESP news or correspondence, having to do with business, from someone, a male, in Wisconsin.)

[...] You were with him, but because of personal loyalty to him and the brothership of male with male was considered sacred—but you became appalled that he was leading his people into destruction.

This was when he was a male in Turkey, as the country has been called, and you were his cohort, as in the dream he had. [...]

The two of you were exceedingly close in male comradeship—far more intense than any known now in your time. [...]

(“Was he male or female?”)

(“Was he male or female?”)

[...] I’m thinking about androgyny, of course, which is the concept of both male and female in one, and/or of hermaphroditism, wherein a person or animal possesses the sexual organs of both the male and the female. [...]

All of which reminds me that to many viewers the “portraits” I paint are balanced equally between the masculine and feminine, regardless of whether the subject in any one of them is male or female. The paintings are of personalities I see mentally rather than physically; they do represent, I believe, my efforts to unify in any particular image my intuitive appreciation of the male/female qualities embodied within each of us.

[...] The individual would say, for example, “I am Joe, and Jane, and Jim, and Bob.”⁶ There are physical variations of a sexual nature, so that on all levels identity includes the male and female. [...]

[...] And a number of old disciplines thought that before the creation of Eve from his body, Adam, the first, original man, was really male and female.

[...] But in the back of your mind you still think that the male holds the position of leadership, and therefore, you resent your own feelings when you try to have the girl behave in that feminine manner. You are trying to order her to be something—a female—when in your heart you wished she was a male, and so when you try to order her about in the dream instead you speak to the brother who is a male, and your words do not make a physical impression. [...]

[...] Therefore, when you consider the question of a supreme being, you imagine a male personality with those abilities that you yourselves possess, with great emphasis upon qualities you admire. [...]

[...] These were all males because at that time of your development, you would not have accepted a female counterpart.

[...] He is not male or female, however, and I use the terms only for convenience’s sake. [...]

You had not been a mother to a male before.

[...] He was impatient with you at times for he remembered you as a companion in male pursuits, and bitterly resented your femininity.

[...] Pat also played the tape for a girl friend of hers outside of school: Ellen Tabb, and Ellen’s friend, Adrian, a male. This makes a total of three women and one male who have heard the tapes besides Pat, whereas Seth names two men and a woman.

“You see the male in terms inspired in you in this childhood. [...] Because while you see the male as godlike, you also see him as one who gives out punishment, and as unreasoning and cruel. [...] Because you were a male in past lives, you resent this all the more.

[...] Now you think of me as an old but wise, extremely powerful male adult, as you thought of your father when you were a child. This attitude overshadows your relationship with the males with whom you come into contact.

[...] He went on to give Lydia a rather detailed description of a past life around the area of Bangor, Maine, in 1832, when she was a male. [...]

He told her that she was projecting this image upon each male she met, and then reacting to it instead of to the individual. [...]

[...] You considered this male in essence. [...]

(9:47.) God, therefore, became male. [...]

[...] After I had remarked aloud that Ruburt sounded like a half-and-half name, meaning male and female.)

Male image confuses you.

He protected himself against early marriage or child bearing by identifying the male writer to some extent with his own writing image. [...] The novelist, the science fiction writer—these were male images needed in the time of his youth.

[...] Your abilities as an artist, for example, were not those relished by mothers in their male offspring. [...]