“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

I will give you some (stereotypes): Ruburt is stubborn. He never forgets a slight. Ruburt is fiercely loyal. Joseph deals in details. His mind is logical rather than intuitive. Ruburt is spontaneous. Joseph is not. All of these are labels, and quite relative. Ruburt is loyal to you. He was not loyal, in those terms, to Walter Zeh, or he would still be with him. Ruburt is spontaneous—but if he were all that spontaneous he would be walking better. You, Joseph, are spontaneous. You do not have to think before you cross the floor—where there Ruburt is aware of the slightest detail—the arrangement of his body or the furniture, the lay of the floor.

[...] You have a loyal core of readers who were already acquainted generally with “occult” books—but to a larger overall extent, that is a steady but dead-end road. [...]

[...] There would have been a lag in sales until the next book, which then triggers the loyal to pick up any of the others they might have missed along the way.

[...] He is deeply loyal, even more to ideas than to people, particularly when his need for freedom is respected. [...]

[...] Ruburt is deeply loyal to him, and he is to Ruburt. [...]

One man you will like far less than the others gathered, but he will be with you nevertheless, and much more loyal than one of the women, who will impress you far more. [...]

[...] I wanted to know what happened to the loyal opposition, I told Jane. [...]

He is loyal to your family. [...]

[...] He felt loyalty to Tam, who he felt was loyal to him. [...]

[...] If he succeeded as a writer, it seemed he was less the loyal wife, and sometimes in the past—the distant past—you felt the same when you tried to be “the male provider,” and take a job to satisfy that narrow role. [...]

He was a dear and loyal friend in another life, and you felt that he betrayed you, but he did not. [...]

(1. Granting Seth’s concept of time: Does the reincarnating personality usually choose to experience its simultaneous lives through various families of consciousness, or is it more likely to remain “loyal” to one such family in all of them? [...]

[...] He is very loyal, particularly to you, Joseph, and is indeed in his own way as trustworthy a friend as you have ever had; this having to do with past experiences also.

[...] They are very loyal. [...]

[...] She’s intensely loyal. [...]

(In ESP class last night Jane told all of her loyal students, some of whom have been with her almost from the time she began holding such meetings in the summer of 1967, that class was suspended until we’d moved into the hill house and settled down a bit — however long that might take.

[...] The captives were quickly freed by secular negotiators loyal to the Iranian clergy, but certainly that kind of virulent anti-Americanism can happen again. [...]

[...] Even now I still correspond with two of those “ex-tenants”—loyal friends indeed!