“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] I am personally aware of your letter. [...] I am composing this note therefore to let you know that I hold you in my mind, and that energy is automatically sent out to you when your letter is received, and when this reply is sent. [...]

(Tonight I asked Jane if Seth would deliver his promised letter for correspondents. [...]

Now: We will begin with a letter.

Now give us a moment; and that is the end of our letter. [...]

These letters are written in an original native language that has little to do with the acquired language that has been picked up in any given country. [...] In this homespun analogy, Mama and Papa send letters back — also in the native language — to their children. [...]

[...] Each expedition sends “letters” back home, commenting upon the behavior, customs, environment, and history of the land in which it finds itself.

(I also told Jane that beside the dream I’d like Seth to comment on the fact that I’d awakened this morning with Maude Cardwell on my mind, including the letter I’d written her a couple of weeks ago. [...] I wanted Seth to comment on Maude’s reaction to the letter. [...]

(Long pause.) Give us a moment … Maude was pleased and also astonished by your letter. [...]

(“A letter connected with an older individual.” Jane said this referred to her letter of January 13 to Dr. Instream. [...]

[...] A letter or note. [...]

[...] A letter connected with an older individual.

[...] A letter or note. [...]

(“Dark lettering.” [...] The object itself does bear dark lettering—both the typing and Jane’s penned notes and corrections.

[...] Dark lettering.

(“Can you give the content of the lettering?”)

(“The subject matter of the lettering. [...]

I hemmed and hawed, decided after talking with Rob that I really didn’t want to do any shows at all, so I wrote one letter so informing Prentice. [...]

Peg told me he was in his forties; he told her he’d written me but probably left before I could answer the letter. [...]

[...] His call reminded me finally of his letter and my response that I wouldn’t be able to see him during his trip. [...]

(“How about answering the letter from Mrs. R. first?” As Seth, Jane reached out for the letter.)

(Before the session we read over a letter Jane had received on March 16, 1971, from Mrs. R. Her son had disappeared on June 28, 1970. [...]

(Eyes closed, Jane leaned back in her rocker with the folded letter in her right hand.)

(“Do you want to deal now with the question about the Dead Sea Scrolls and Yahoshua?” This was in reference to a letter Jane had received on April 12, having to do with Seth’s third-Christ data in The Seth Material.)

[...] For the test object I used a letter from my brother Loren, who lives in Tunkhannock, PA. [...] My brother inadvertently dated the letter 1965 instead of 1966.

(“Ruburt’s connection: A disturbing event,” is a good reference to the balance of my brother’s letter, which is not included on page 197. The contents of this part of the letter are available however to anyone studying these results.

A letter from New York mentioning a meeting, the initial P connected with this.

(“The habit of squirreling away” is a good reference to my father, in whose photographic studio my brother Loren took the pictures he refers to in the test letter. [...]

[...] While she ate I read Saul’s letter, and began to laugh. [...] After lunch Jane tried to read Saul’s letter, but couldn’t manage it. [...]

[...] I picked up the mail at the box before I left—including a riotous letter from Saul Cohen, our editor at Prentice-Hall. [...]

[...] He promised a letter of explanation which still hasn’t arrived as of this session. Even though Jane received a second telegram a few days ago, again promising the letter.

[...] Letters were exchanged for some little time. In her letter of November 12 Jane asked A.J. a few questions about The Five. [...]

(A.J.’s letter arrived this afternoon, Wednesday, November 25. Since a session was due tonight, Jane studied the letter in the event Seth would choose to deal with it this evening. [...]

[...] A.J.’s letter lay on my writing table.)

(Jane smiled and picked up the letter.)

[...] An editor rejected the book but wrote a very encouraging letter concerning the publication of the Seth material. [...]

[...] (Her eyes open, Jane picked up the letter from Prentice-Hall briefly.) This is the direction toward which you should move. [...]

(Again Jane picked up the letter from Prentice-Hall.) The material in the dream book should be utilized here.

[...] These should go into this book (the letter indicated again). [...]

[...] And I found another check for $1000 in a letter, as a donation to Jane’s hospital-expenses fund. [...]

(I might add that yesterday I opened a letter from the BBC — the British Broadcasting Corporation — that was dated in January. [...]

(Just yesterday Jane received a letter from a woman who described the onset, a few years ago, of extraordinary feelings of transcendent love for mankind. [...]

(Aside from her sympathetic response, Jane found the letter evocative of some of her own psychic experiences, and asked me to put it in our Seth notebook for an answer — we felt that Seth’s reply would be of interest to many. [...]

Now: A note to the woman whose letter you have there. [...]

The substance of a letter, colon: “I will meet with you on March 2, if there is no change in plan.” [...] The letter from a man to Dr. Instream concerning a series, now, of tests. [...]

(“and a letter that did not meet your approval.” This is a reference to the letter written to Jane and me by Linda’s mother, on January 24, telling us about Linda’s marriage on January 22.

A spectacular-enough result in certain tests conducted by Dr. Instream since his last letter to you.

[...] November six three, and a letter that did not meet your approval. [...]

[...] All I have here are the letters (spelled out) D E L. Someone connected with him has a sister in Spokane. [...]

Letters Q U A still a connection here. [...]

At noon she’d received another upsetting letter. I was most interested tonight as Seth discussed the implications of the letter, along with two thoughts Jane had picked up from him a week ago Monday, on the day she held the 915th session: “Alone, reason finally becomes unreasonable. [...]

Ruburt (Jane) today received a letter from a man who would certainly be labeled a schizophrenic. [...]

I believe his mail is late because of the storm, and that he will receive a letter from the Midwest, later than he would have ordinarily. The letter not entirely unexpected. Duplicity, or a dual manner, in connection with a man who wrote the letter.

[...] (Here now Ruburt thinks of your niece, and the letter announcing her marriage. [...]

[...] But after this Jane kept veering toward the letter. [...]

[...] I mentioned specifically Ruburt’s impression that the item had to do with a particular letter purposely, to tip him off, so to speak.

[...] It might be said the abstract shapes of the letters in Portland, Maine, within the circular postmark, are angular. Of course the letters are not in line, being confined within the circle shape. [...]

(“And small dark lettering, perhaps I N C.” [...] At bottom center on the back of the object, in small capital lettering, is the logo and address of: DP—Dexter Press, Inc., West Nyack, New York. [...]

[...] Connection with a letter or note, and a male. [...]

[...] And small dark lettering, perhaps I N C.

[...] Tam has requested that we send him a letter outlining our position re a competent professional translator of the French Seth Speaks. I was going to do the letter this weekend, but didn’t. I asked Jane if she would write the letter, and she agreed to. [...]

(We’ve begun getting letters mentioning Mass Events—all laudatory—and these have helped, as Seth mentioned they would.

[...] She was eventually brought up to date on the situation by letter.