“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] Your letters have an effect, whether or not it seems that any given questions are being answered.

(Seth stated that the editors at Cosmo would be interested, and that in answer to Jane’s query, which would consist of a chapter from her ESP book plus a letter outlining her ideas on adapting it for the magazine, they would send a letter of interest. [...]

[...] She also plans to write him a letter. [...]

(Bill Gallagher pointed out that my name and date on the drawing, besides being a “sign,” also contained a combination of 10 letters and numbers, as “something 10 times.” [...]

[...] I can be aware of myself as I dictate this book through Jane Roberts, and yet also be aware of myself in my own environment; for I send only a portion of myself here, as you perhaps send out a portion of your consciousness as you write a letter to a friend, and yet are aware of the room in which you sit. I send out much more than you do in a letter, for a portion of my consciousness is now within the entranced woman as I dictate, but the analogy is close enough.

A connection with a letter or phone call and a small child. [...]

([John:] “You say that ultimately I will go south and west, and a connection with the letter M. What do you mean, ultimately?”)

[...] I spent the morning typing letters from Jane, Seth, and me for Maude Cardwell to send to donors. I also wrote Maude a letter of my own. [...]

Now Van Over, in answer to your question, was telepathically aware of Bernard’s letter, and understood it. [...]

[...] The info above covers Dr. Gene Bernard’s recent letter on our behalf to Prentice-Hall, and Raymond Van Over’s telepathic understanding of same.)

[...] I did a couple of letters until she was ready to resume, then read the last line to her. [...]

Dr. Barnard was kind enough to write a letter to the publishers of this present book, giving his opinions and mentioning that session (Number 303). (More than this, he let me use his real name, rather than hiding behind a pseudonym.) In his letter he said: In the session “I chose topics of conversation which were clearly of tolerable interest to Seth and considerable interest to me, and which by that time I had every reason to believe were largely foreign territory to Jane. [...]

[...] One of these early letters was responsible for my next out-of-body trip during a Seth session.

On May 3, 1967, Peg and Bill Gallagher dropped in for our regular Monday night session, and as we sat around chatting, I told them about a letter I’d just received that amused me—and sort of outraged me at the same time.

Four days after Sue’s visit we received an enthusiastic letter from an independent motion-picture producer and director in Hollywood, informing us that he’s finally succeeding in his quest for an option to the film rights to Jane’s novel, The Education of Oversoul Seven. [...]

During this session hiatus I’ve been spending much time upon a series of letters to the publishers of Seth Speaks in Switzerland and in the Netherlands, as well as to those in charge at Prentice-Hall.¹ Last Saturday night we had a very interesting meeting with a psychologist from New York City. [...]

1. Some of my letters were triggered on October 9 (this month), when Jane and I received our first copies of Seth Spreekt, the Dutch-language edition of Seth Speaks. We saw at once that the people at Ankh-Hermes, the publishing company in the Netherlands, had cut the book considerably. [...]

[...] I did not do so because I remembered a dream Jane had had recently, in which I had picked up the mail, then teased her about an optimistic letter from a publisher, concerning the dream book. [...]

[...] In fact, I’d almost forgotten I’d written a letter to her last week. [...]

[...] Through a call Penny had arranged, I talked to Luke around the holidays, and Lois subsequently wrote us a letter giving us all the latest news about their family, Mrs. Potter, etc. [...]

The Prentice letter caused him to react with a burst of spontaneous pleasure. [...]

It was, then, the burst of spontaneity caused by the letter that also freed him for the next natural development in our sessions. [...]

[...] It gradually picked up speed while Jane wrote down each letter it paused over. [...] It might be added here that out of a whole page of strings of letters, there were no instances of accidental spellings of words—not even short words like to, as, but, is, on, etc. [...]

[...] Hence his discomfort in taking dictation of even a simple letter that must be transcribed in faithful replica to the words and ideas of another.

[...] In the past this had never worked for me, the pointer not even moving over the letters.

[...] He had a phone call at 3 PM today, from a colleague, having to do with something discussed in a letter; though I am not sure that the letter was written to, or by, the individual on the other end of the phone.

The conversation may have had to do with a letter written to another individual. [...]

[...] Now I have the letters R and J. Whether these are initials of one man, or the first letters of two men’s names, I do not know.

[...] The letters L A R come into mind here, and I do not know specifically to what they refer.

(Tam has written Jane a letter covering the above episode; the letter will go into our files, etc.)

[...] Fred said the insurance hassle is “a matter of writing letters back and forth.” [...]

[...] I turned down his request to sign a letter of authorization. [...]

(We were discussing the letter and half-facetiously wondering whether Seth might respond in any way, when Jane suddenly told me that she was picking up material on the “essence” of William James. [...] He wasn’t mentioned in the psychologist’s letter, for instance. [...]

[...] Another is my own longtime interest in the American psychologist and philosopher, William James [1842–1910]; he wrote the classic The Varieties of Religious Experience.³ A third is a letter received last week from a Jungian psychologist who had been inspired by Seth’s material on the Swiss psychologist and psychiatrist, Carl Jung [1875–1961], in Chapter 13 of Seth Speaks. [...]

(The letter from the Jungian psychologist evidently provided the immediate impetus for the fly episode and for Monday evening’s events, though. [...]

[...] A letter from a Jungian psychologist helped serve as a stimulus. [...]

[...] I said I’d probably received her latest letter, but hadn’t answered mail for some time.

[...] For all of your own regrets and recriminations about Prentice, for example, he was himself pleased by Tam’s letter today, that that bridge toward motion had not been severed. [...]

(For the record: Seth referred to Tam’s letter in which he informed Jane that Prentice-Hall had granted her a continuation of the old contract terms and royalty rates. [...]