“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] You represented yourself, and yet you also represented your idea of the species in its relationship to the acquisition of any ultimate knowledge. [...]

[...] No particular structure of knowledge can lead you to it. [...]

Any individual faithfully traveling into the psyche, with integrity, could show the way, for any such search must necessarily lead to the source of creativity and knowledge.

The book will yield a tremendous amount of psychological knowledge, for little if at all has been done to explain the subjective personality ...

There is a June date here insofar as your knowledge of the development is concerned, and there are two partners, or two allied men within your firm who will break apart.

Now you may not be certain of my existence, but be certain of my knowledge. [...]

[...] You cannot afford to keep knowledge at an intellectual level, and not use it practically, for when you do so it is useless to you. [...]

[...] On Ruburt’s part this time it was additional knowledge. [...]

[...] Simply the knowledge that the psychic endeavors will help your creativity should be a sufficient impetus.

(Humorously.) My telepathic abilities must not be operating well this evening, for I took it for granted that this is what you meant by your question; knowing what I did of your use of the psychic knowledge in your present works.

This book however will also point out the truths that do exist within the tattered garments of organized established religions; rip apart the crumbling fabric of dogma to the body of revelationary knowledge that was always there.

It is from the bank of knowledge then that I can relate to others, and they realize intuitively that on such occasions I am not speaking down to them. [...]

[...] Knowledge within your brain does not take up physical space within your brain. [...]

[...] This force is part of the innate knowledge within all consciousness and it is a part of the God within you. [...]

The pendulum should be used to uncover feelings, to allow feedback between portions of the self, but mostly as a way of implanting new knowledge and constructive suggestions and feelings of safety to the “subconscious.”

I wanted you to know what you did right, and use that knowledge to structure your current behavior. [...]

(In the same average voice she began: “In the shadow of the image organized religion [at the same time my hands want to fly up], after it has been set up, has always been afraid of revelationary knowledge; to protect itself; and the Catholic Church in particular cast it in the form of a devil, which I was taught: the sin of pride, wanting to learn.”

(Jane continued: “But that devil image comes from a long pagan line of earth gods, and always represented the innate knowledge inherent even in the earth itself. [...]

[...] As I told Jane at our first break, the knowledge that time is actually simultaneous is sometimes confounding when one asks certain types of questions; this knowledge half answers the question, yet we want the rest of the question considered.)

Within you there is indeed innate knowledge of all the selves that you have been, and of all the selves that you shall be, and this knowledge sustains you even when you do not know consciously that it exists.

[...] For in the miraculous spontaneity of the sun, there is discipline that utterly escapes you, and a knowledge beyond any that we know. And in the spontaneous playing of the bees from flower to flower, there is a discipline beyond any that you know, and laws that follow their own knowledge, and joy that is beyond command. [...]

“True self-knowledge is indispensable for health or vitality. [...]

“Now all of this is basic knowledge if you would understand why the personality accepts even an impeding action such as illness despite the ego’s resistence to pain.”

“In other words, an action cannot be judged as impeding without a thorough knowledge of the actions that result in the makeup of any given personality. [...]

[...] In certain terms it was tragic and painful but it was not Ruburt’s fault, and within it his mother achieved a different kind of knowledge and even triumphant experience.

[...] There is at least a possibility that you and Ruburt, using your own individual inner senses, may at times perceive different aspects of a given situation, and that the individual perceptions will enable you to achieve a greater knowledge of a specific, or any specific, happening than either of you separately could achieve. [...]

This knowledge automatically changes the dream state into another in which the critical faculties are aroused and operating. [...]

[...] You have knowledge of your ‘past’ personalities and know that they exist simultaneously with your own.

[...] It interprets the inner knowledge gained in its own way, true, but it is immeasurably enriched by so doing.

[...] Most of the knowledge gained escapes the ego, and the experiences cannot be translated by the physical brain.

[...] Usually it means that knowledge itself is somehow dangerous. [...]

[...] The fact that its reality is only limited to your level, and does not extend to other fields, must not tempt you to discount it; and yet while you must behave in a large manner as if your universe were inherently and basically objective, you must still retain the knowledge that this apparent objectivity has great limits, even practically speaking; and a too-great dependence in a world of objectivity can lead to a psychic imprisonment which is unnecessary.

Nor is this material itself in any way meant to suggest that the attempt for knowledge is futile. [...]

[...] In this book [Volume 2], therefore, we will be stressing interior ways of attaining, not necessarily facts, but knowledge and wisdom. [...] They can, if they are slavishly followed, lead you away from true knowledge. [...]

[...] The consciousness of the mouse, under the innate knowledge of impending pain, leaves its body. [...]

[...] He also projects upon cellular components like genes and DNA¹⁴ learned concepts of “protection” and “selfishness”: DNA is said to care only about its own survival and “knowledge,” and not whether its host is man, plant, or animal. [...]

(I continue my projections by writing that to a molecule of DNA the conventional notion of evolution — could such an entity grasp that idea, or even want to — might be hilarious indeed, given its own enhanced time scheme.¹⁷ Actually it would be more to the point if perhaps with the aid of hypnosis and/or visualization, we tried from our giant-sized viewpoints to touch such minute consciousnesses with our own,¹⁸ and so extend our knowledge in unexpected ways. [...]

[...] Self-understanding and self-knowledge may be able to change the individuals’ lives for the better, regardless of their activities or conditions of life. [...]

They represented parts of his own psyche, still, at that level of consciousness, not having quite assimilated the greater knowledge or experience, so he felt he needed protection—the protection that would beautifully, cleverly and insidiously serve all of his purposes, allowing him to go ahead as he wanted to, but with control drawn back to the body’s discontent. [...]