“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

(10:52.) You are so used to thinking in terms of mechanics, that it seems to you that uneducated people did not understand the connection between the sexual act of intercourse and childbirth. You are so used to one kind of explanation for childbirth, so familiar with one specific framework, that alternate explanations appear to be the height of nonsense. So it is fashionable to believe that early man did not understand the connection between intercourse and birth.

(Intently:) It is the height of idiocy to imagine that because of the time taken in pregnancy, the female could not understand the child’s origin in intercourse. The body’s knowledge did not need a complicated language. For that matter, your literal interpretation of childbirth is by some standards a highly limited one. In your terms, it is technically correct.

[...] If each act of intercourse were meant to produce a child, you would have overrun the planet before you began. [...]

[...] First of all, sexuality per se does not necessarily lead to intercourse. [...]

[...] Earlier his own spontaneous nature, his desire for social intercourse, his simple love of fun, were strong enough to overcome the inner feelings that made him shy away from people. [...]

[...] Both of you often try to hide in your work from normal daily intercourse with others, and to make your work carry the burden of your humanity. [...]

[...] A democratic society offers the greatest challenges and possibilities of achievement for the individual and the species, for it allows for the free intercourse of ideas. [...]

[...] It is pathetic and ludicrous for them to believe that they must have intercourse frequently in their youth, or to set up standards of normality against which they must measure their sexual experience.

[...] Physical intercourse may or may not take place according to your moods, but the physical endearments and the feelings of closeness, being cherished and assured are definitely important on Ruburt’s part.

[...] You did not trust intercourse anymore than he did.

[...] You might undress in the dark, or think, if you are married, of the sexual act of intercourse as dirty. [...]

[...] It is said that some primitive peoples did not connect the fact of intercourse with the fact of birth. [...]

So your present experience is quite different than that of those forefathers who lived in the medieval world, say, and you cannot appreciate the differences in your [present] subjective attitudes, and in the quality, as well as the kind of, social intercourse that exists now. [...]