“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] And Joseph, we will go into the inner senses shortly. [...]

[...] The mobility of consciousness will automatically allow you greater freedom in using your inner perceptions in waking life also. [...]

“It is a logistic contradiction to imagine, with your physical structures, that any perception can be received without the perceiver’s inner situation being altered. [...]

Learning to some extent is indeed passed on through the genes, bio-chemically, but this is a physical materialization of inner knowledge achieved and retained from past lives. [...]

[...] If so, do we do this frequently, so that our private fantasies have an inner coherence with those of our fellow human beings — and connections with them — that quite escapes our usual notice?

[...] Jane and I know Leonard fairly well, but actually know little of his inner feelings, his friends, etc. [...]

[...] To attend to your life in such a fashion brings you into a clearer communication with the inner action of your own existence.

[...] It is that we cannot make it work for us the way we want it to—that is, to evidently supersede deep and powerful inner goals. [...]

[...] At one time she was his mother, and she did this with full inner knowledge. [...]

There will be no doubt if they trust their inner reactions. [...]

[...] It depends upon some sort of inner psychological decision as to what will be considered self, and therefore accepted by consciousness, and that which will be considered notself, and not accepted by consciousness.

[...] As Seth told us in Session 20, on January 23, 1964: “Time and space, dear friends, are both camouflage patterns, therefore the fact that the inner senses can conquer time and space is not, after all, so surprising. To the mind with its subconscious, and to the inner senses, there is no time or space....” [...]

[...] These have resulted in necessary insights on his part that will themselves cause the release of energy from the inner self.” [...]

[...] The former is physical, the latter is psychic, a part of our inner bank of knowledge. [...]

Those kinds of conflicts can only exist in a society in which the entire concept of creativity is segmented, in which the creative processes are often seen as inner assembly lines leading to specific products: a society in which the very nature of creativity itself is largely ignored unless its “products” serve specific ends.

[...] Yet I also wanted a personality which would allow itself the spontaneity necessary, and the inner freedom, so that such communications could take place. [...]