“Seth material” search engine (Jane Roberts)

[...] An incident with candy bars as a child, of approximately 6, or in grade six. [...]

(Meaning the Jane Fleming incident at The Elms in Elmira Heights; covered in Session 204, Volume 5 of The Early Sessions.)

Your particular personality is not helped if I should tell you what to do in the specific incidents that are requested. [...]

As far as our dream experiments are concerned, I believe that you will discover definite correlations of a rather important nature that exist between the incidence of precognitive dreams, and data having to do with temperature and weather.

Now all of this is not meant to apply to specific incidents mentioned by you earlier, but only to clear several matters that we have not discussed thoroughly enough, involving the normal psychological aspects involved in clairvoyant information. [...]

(The following may be one of those incidents from Framework 2 that Seth advised being on the lookout for: Last week I rather seriously thought of ordering a copy of The Origin of Ccs In the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind by Jaynes. [...]

Now on one occasion he did very well, although he picked up strong ideas from you of a negative nature, and this incident, in time, was connected with the college affair. [...]

I nodded, remembering only too well the incident to which Rob referred. [...]

[...] Instead of making them face the facts of his separation, couldn’t such an incident simply make things worse? [...]

[...] This can be considered an incident, that is the unscheduled session and ensuing events, that should show you that our personal material does have validity.

[...] This may mean the incidence of a disease, but the disease may save a person’s sanity. [...]

[...] Over a period of several weeks, for example, he will have dealt with specific incidents and his reactions.

[...] Not remembering any injurious incidents, Jane came home quite upset.

[...] I told her that it looked as though Seth used my newspaper incident to actually summarize in capsule form much of the material he’s been giving us in this latest group of private sessions. [...]

[...] Have him tell you of the Rochester incidents.

[...] She flinched so I thought he interrupted her, but upon coming out of trance Jane said she hardly remembered the incident. [...]

(For the session, we both hoped Seth would at least comment on the Stuart incidents, and in relation to her own challenges.)

[...] It was simply an emotional one, a trivial incident, however, that you picked up telepathically. [...]

[...] For a related specific incident, see the description of her dentist episode in the 152nd session. [...]

[...] You must remember that in this case we were not thinking of a hypothetical question but of one individual and one individual incident, and there lies the difference for we cannot really generalize in that area. [...]

One small but amusing incident came up that illustrates my attitude during those early months. [...]